1982
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.25.991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin-density-wave state of chromium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the three equivalent < 001 > directions for a cubic lattice, Cr predominantly exhibits a single-Q IC-SDW state which spontaneously breaks the lattice symmetry. The multi-Q SDW (superposition of different Q) was predicted to be energetically unfavorable 24,25 . Therefore, different single-Q domains with orthogonal Q orientations will coexist 26,27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the three equivalent < 001 > directions for a cubic lattice, Cr predominantly exhibits a single-Q IC-SDW state which spontaneously breaks the lattice symmetry. The multi-Q SDW (superposition of different Q) was predicted to be energetically unfavorable 24,25 . Therefore, different single-Q domains with orthogonal Q orientations will coexist 26,27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite several decades of intense theoretical work which led to the construction of a successful microscopic SDW model for cromium [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], there is a surprising aspect of the AFM behavior in this material which escapes any microscopic understanding so far. It is the famous spinflip (SF) transition as a function of temperature for which there are only phenomenological accounts within a Landau framework [4,[13][14][15]. Spin-orbit coupling and dipoledipole interactions have been shown to be unable to produce a spin-flip transition with temperature [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%