Anhydrous
CoCl2 or [NiCl2(DME)] reacts with
the ligand PCPMe-iPr (1)
in the presence of nBuLi to afford the 15e and 16e square planar complexes [Co(PCPMe-iPr)Cl] (2) and [Ni(PCPMe-iPr)Cl] (3), respectively.
Complex 2 is a paramagnetic d7 low-spin complex,
which is a useful precursor for a series of Co(I), Co(II), and Co(III)
PCP complexes. Complex 2 reacts readily with CO and pyridine
to afford the five-coordinate square-pyramidal 17e complexes [Co(PCPMe-iPr)(CO)Cl] (4) and [Co(PCPMe-iPr)(py)Cl] (5), respectively, while in the presence of Ag+ and
CO the cationic complex [Co(PCPMe-iPr)(CO)2]+ (6) is afforded. The effective
magnetic moments μeff of all Co(II) complexes were
derived from the temperature dependence of the inverse molar magnetic
susceptibility by SQUID measurements and are in the range 1.9 to 2.4
μB. This is consistent with a d7 low-spin
configuration with some degree of spin–orbit coupling. Oxidation
of 2 with CuCl2 affords the paramagnetic Co(III)
PCP complex [Co(PCPMe-iPr)Cl2] (7), while the synthesis of the diamagnetic Co(I)
complex [Co(PCPMe-iPr)(CO)2] (8) was achieved by stirring 2 in toluene
with KC8 in the presence of CO. Finally, the cationic 16e Ni(II) PCP complex [Ni(PCPMe-iPr)(CO)]+ (10) was obtained by reacting complex 3 with 1 equiv of AgSbF6 in the presence of CO.
The reactivity of CO addition to Co(I), Co(II), and Ni(II) PCP square
planar complexes of the type [M(PCPMe-iPr)(CO)]n (n = +1, 0)
was investigated by DFT calculations, showing that formation of the
Co species, 6 and 8, is thermodynamically
favorable, while Ni(II) maintains the 16e configuration
since CO addition is unfavorable in this case. X-ray structures of
most complexes are provided and discussed. A structural feature of
interest is that the apical CO ligand in 4 deviates significantly
from linearity, with a Co–C–O angle of 170.0(1)°.
The DFT-calculated value is 172°, clearly showing that this is
not a packing but an electronic effect.