2015
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3749-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin connection and renormalization of teleparallel action

Abstract: In general relativity, inertia and gravitation are both included in the Levi-Civita connection. As a consequence, the gravitational action, as well as the corresponding energy-momentum density, are in general contaminated by spurious contributions coming from inertial effects. In teleparallel gravity, on the other hand, because the spin connection represents inertial effects only, it is possible to separate inertia from gravitation. Relying on this property, it is shown that to each tetrad there is naturally a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
126
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be remarked, however, that both of them transform covariantly under global tangent-space Lorentz transformations. The lack of a local Lorentz covariance in the tetrad teleparallel gravity can be considered as the teleparallel manifestation of the pseudotensor character of the gravitational energy-momentum density of GR [121,[126][127][128].…”
Section: Gravitational Energy-momentum Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be remarked, however, that both of them transform covariantly under global tangent-space Lorentz transformations. The lack of a local Lorentz covariance in the tetrad teleparallel gravity can be considered as the teleparallel manifestation of the pseudotensor character of the gravitational energy-momentum density of GR [121,[126][127][128].…”
Section: Gravitational Energy-momentum Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note the interesting feature that in simple TEGR this is not the case, even if one keeps a non-zero spin connection. In order to see this, one starts by explicitly writing the torsion scalar as [126][127][128] T (e…”
Section: Restoring Local Lorentz Invariance In F (T ) Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we notice, in the GR limit the terms violating local Lorentz invariance also vanish in the general field equations, so in the models where GR is an attractor, the problematic degrees of freedom get dynamically suppressed by the cosmological evolution. A very recent proposal to recover local Lorentz invariance is to formulate the theory in a covariant way [15] by including purely inertial spin connection (still leading to zero curvature), carefully delineating the effects of gravitation and inertia [16]. Since the flat FLRW tetrad in Cartesian coordinates is already "proper" [15], we can expect the ensuing cosmological equations not to get additional spin connection contributions and our results will still be valid in the putative covariant formulation of scalartorsion gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This is relevant, for example, in theoretical models of calm stars, idealized galaxies, or any distribution of matter which may be approximated as spherical and time independent. We take the following tetrad 8) which is compatible with the well-known following metric:…”
Section: Case I: Static Spherical Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in that version of the theory one must choose a metric compatible tetrad which also yields zero for the components ω a bν . If this is not done correctly, then one is inadvertently including inertial (non-gravitational) effects into the resulting equations of motion [8], [9]. This is essentially the origin of the "non-Lorentz covariance" of traditional F (T ) gravity [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] [14], and leads one to having to choose a "good" tetrad [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%