2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16732.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin angular momentum evolution of the long-period Algols

Abstract: We consider the spin angular momentum evolution of the accreting components of Algol‐type binary stars. In wider Algols the accretion is through a disc so that the accreted material can transfer enough angular momentum to the gainer that material at its equator should be spinning at breakup. We demonstrate that even a small amount of mass transfer, much less than required to produce today's mass ratios, transfers enough angular momentum to spin the gainer up to this critical rotation velocity. However the accr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(90 reference statements)
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is in good agreement with the mass transfer rate given in Polidan (1989). It is pointed out by Simon (1999) and Dervisoglu et al (2010) that the gainer rotates at the high equatorial velocity of ∼212 km s −1 . This is, however, far below the critical velocity of ∼612 km s −1 so that in view of the Roche model (e.g.…”
Section: A2 Three Gainers With An Accretion Disksupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value is in good agreement with the mass transfer rate given in Polidan (1989). It is pointed out by Simon (1999) and Dervisoglu et al (2010) that the gainer rotates at the high equatorial velocity of ∼212 km s −1 . This is, however, far below the critical velocity of ∼612 km s −1 so that in view of the Roche model (e.g.…”
Section: A2 Three Gainers With An Accretion Disksupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A refined value of T spot ≈ 30 000 K was then assigned to the hot spot by the same author who assumes that this HTAR (high temperature accretion region) radiates as a black body. It is also interesting to notice that the gainer in this binary rotates 7.8 times faster than the synodic value (Dervisoglu et al 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the study of Dervişoglu et al (2010), there are, however, basically no simulations that follow the angular-momentum evolution for both the stars and the orbit in detail, and that account for torques arising from tides, mass transfer, magnetic-field effects, disc accretion or direct impact, and spin-down mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disk will be considered as permanent (or high viscous) provided that the fluid's material bulk viscosity is efficient enough to return the proffered angular momentum back to the orbit (once more, we adopt the notation of Kaitchuck et al 1985) or, equivalently, when it experiences a strong coupling regime with the donor (e.g., Hut & Paczynski 1984;Verbunt & Rappaport 1988). However, material at the inner edge of the disk still has angular momentum that acts to spin up the accretor at the expense of the orbital angular momentum (e.g., Packet 1981;Marsh et al 2004;Dervişoglu et al 2010;Deschamps et al 2013). The description of the period evolution of such systems does not differ at all from those systems that accommodate a transient disk, by simply replacing r r by r 2 = R 2 /A orb or r 1 = R 1 /A orb when the gainer is the less or the more massive star, respectively (Marsh et al 2004).…”
Section: Mass Transfer In the Presence Of A Permanent Accretion Diskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Algols, for instance, tides seem incapable of spinning down the gainer during the transfer process (Dervişoglu et al 2010;Deschamps et al 2013), considering that radiative damping is the driving tidal dissipation mechanism for stars with a radiative envelope (Zahn 1977). By using the appropriate tidal torque and apsidal motion constants of Zahn (1975, see Table 1 of his work) for the gainer of IO UMa (M 1 = 2.1 M , e.g., Soydugan et al 2013), for example, a long synchronization time of 9.69 × 10 9 yr arises.…”
Section: Mathematical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%