1956
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.102.1542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin and Polarization Effects in the Annihilation of Triplet Positronium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect, which will not affect f d after around 0.75 T [69], reduces the amount of long lived Ps present by mixing m = 0 triplet and singlet states [70]. However, increasing the magnetic field also increases the positron beam density, and the increased Ps yield due to e-h pair production partially compensates for the magnetic quenching, otherwise the difference in percent delayed fractions would be around 40 % [71,54]. Figure 5 shows the Ps yield as a function of temperature for the n-Ge (a) and n-Si (b) samples.…”
Section: B Ps Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect, which will not affect f d after around 0.75 T [69], reduces the amount of long lived Ps present by mixing m = 0 triplet and singlet states [70]. However, increasing the magnetic field also increases the positron beam density, and the increased Ps yield due to e-h pair production partially compensates for the magnetic quenching, otherwise the difference in percent delayed fractions would be around 40 % [71,54]. Figure 5 shows the Ps yield as a function of temperature for the n-Ge (a) and n-Si (b) samples.…”
Section: B Ps Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that η =1 would be expected for an ideal version of our experiment in which the total energy of 2 and 3 photon decays both contribute equally to the detector response. A smaller value of η would result from the preferential absorption of the lower energy 3γ decay photons in the chamber walls and surrounding materials, and also from the directionality of the 3γ decays in a strong magnetic field which do not favor detection of |m|=1 ortho Ps decays in a plane perpendicular to the magnetic field direction [57]. A larger value of η would result if the total number of photons were an important factor, for example due to preferential scattering of the lower energy 3γ annihilation photons into the detector.…”
Section: B Single Shot Lifetime Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drisko [201] calculated the angular distributions for photons emitted in triplet state decays and showed that the distribution of annihilation gamma rays depends on the azimuthal quantum number m. We can immediately see why this must be the case; for m = 0 decays three photons with helicity = +1 are emitted, but the total angular momentum projected along the quantization axis must be zero. This limits the possible angles with which annihilation photons from m = 0 states can be emitted and still conserve momentum in a different way from the restrictions on the m = 1 states.…”
Section: Ps Annihilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the possible angles with which annihilation photons from m = 0 states can be emitted and still conserve momentum in a different way from the restrictions on the m = 1 states. The number of photons emitted as a function of angle for the different m states was found to be [201] …”
Section: Ps Annihilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in Ref. 55 that the amplitudes for the three-photon annihilation of orthopositronium H f i (X 1,+1 , X 1,0 , X 1,−1 ) can be written as 21) where the vector u 1 is a function of the photon polarization vectors:…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%