Spillover Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policy in Asia and the Pacific

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Asian Development Bank InstituteThe Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI's working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication.ADB recognizes "China" as the People's Republic of China; "Hong Kong" as Hong Kong, China; and "Korea" as the Republic of Korea. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published.Asian Development Bank Institute Kasumigaseki Building 8F 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-6008, JapanTel:+81-3-3593-5500 Fax:+81-3-3593-5571 URL:www.adbi.org E-mail: info@adbi.org AbstractWe assess the evolution of spillover effects of unconventional monetary policies (UMPs) on Asia and the Pacific region, and evaluate the impact on and implications for the macroeconomy. We develop a Panel Vector Auto Regression model for Asia and the Pacific region for a period covering data from first quarter 2000 until first quarter 2015. We split the overall sample into two subsets: the Pre-Crisis (2000q1-2006q4) and Post-Crisis (2009q1-2015q1) samples. We identify UMP shocks with a shadow interest rate estimated by Krippner (2013).We find that Asia and the Pacific region has responded to the advanced economies' actions with accommodative monetary policy. Such lower interest rates were coupled with currency appreciation, asset price inflation, and strong movements in capital flows. Foreign investors have shifted their preferences for bonds in Asia and the Pacific. If prior to the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), the "global saving glut" hypothesis (i.e., Asian savings flight to the US) was one of the major effects resulting in booming US house prices, it is clear that a reversal effect has dominated the economy after the GFC: funds flight to As...

Do foreign banks in India respond to global monetary policy shocks? A SVAR analysis

“…This IMPS can affect emerging economies’ macroeconomic fundamentals such as interest rate, output, inflation, exchange rate and portfolio flows and so on (Suzuki, 2008; So, 2017; Kose et al , 2017). Further, the enriched empirical literature has provided the evidence of advanced countries’ monetary policy shock to emerging economies (Kim, 2001; Canova, 2005; Maćkowiak, 2007; Cerutti, et al , 2015; Aizenman et al , 2017; Ammer et al , 2016; Punzi and Chantapacdepong, 2017). Specifically, this IMPS has reflected in their macroeconomic variables such as exchange rate (Maćkowiak, 2007; Aizenman and Binici, 2016; Cerutti et al , 2015; Gupta et al , 2017), interest rate (Kim, 2001; Maćkowiak, 2007) and equity prices and bond yields (Gupta et al , 2017).…”

Monetary policy responses of Asian countries to spillovers from US monetary policy

“…2 In these studies, the effects are normally considered under the assumption of the use of conventional tools of monetary policy (by the source country); although several recent studies look at the effects of unconventional tools of monetary stimulus that many central banks experimented with after the GFC. The US or the Euro area usually represent the source country due to their relatively influential position in the world economy (see, for example, Beckworth and Crowe 2013, Chen et al 2016, Edwards 2016, Potjagailo 2017, Gagnon et al 2017, Ma ckowiak 2007, Neely 2010, Rey 2016, Roger et al 2013, Punzi and Chantapacdepong 2017, Taylor 2013. Claus et al (2016) examine how shocks to US and Japanese monetary policy affect their own asset market and the spillover into each other's market for the period from January 1998 to June 2015.…”

Identifying the Factors Affecting Financial Condition of Malaysia

“…Chen et al, ( 2016) implied the US MP spillover effects are relatively more evident on the EMEs than AEs in general, even diverse results shown on EMEs. Punzi and Chantapacdepong (2017) suggested the UMP stance in the AEs tends to be reacted with accommodative MP by central banks in the Asia-Pacific region. Spillover effects of the US's UMP led to volatile capital flows, strengthening currency, and escalating asset prices in the EMEs (Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2017).…”

“…Eventually, studies have mushroomed to examine the influence of US UMP measures both on the US and the rest of the economies, i.e. small developed nations and developing regions (Chen, Filardo, He, & Zhu, 2016;Hofmann & Takats, 2015;Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2017). The literature majorly revolves around the theme of US policy rates' alteration and LSAPs announcements, while lesser on the theme of the LSAPs' actual operation (Bauer & Neely, 2014;Borio & Zabai, 2018;Neely & Bhattarai, 2016).…”