2002
DOI: 10.34080/os.v12.22839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spillepengs backsvalor Riparia riparia – studier vid en nyskapad skånsk koloni

Abstract: In 2001, we followed the burrow excavation phase, measured the length of the burrows, and analysed the nest content of invertebrates after breeding at a Sand Martin Riparia riparia colony near Malmö. After a spontaneous establishment of 50 pairs in 1999, the site was artificially improved, and about 250 pairs bred in 2000. Further improvement was made in 2001 to avoid predation which resulted in about 300 breeding pairs. The main excavation phase was between 7 May (a late spring) and early June. The mean burro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depths in our current study (mean 53 cm; min: 25 cm and max: 103 cm) vary within similar ranges as they did in the data reported by Svensson [73] (mean 58 cm, min: 18 cm, and max: 90 cm, Ammarnäs-Sweden), Hopkins and Officer [74] (min: 35 cm and max: 103 cm), and Mondain-Monval and Sharp [75] (min: 30 cm and max: 100 cm, Whittington, Lancashire, United Kingdom). We assumed that differences in colony locations (lakeshore vs. river banks vs. artificial nest locations) could contribute to these differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The depths in our current study (mean 53 cm; min: 25 cm and max: 103 cm) vary within similar ranges as they did in the data reported by Svensson [73] (mean 58 cm, min: 18 cm, and max: 90 cm, Ammarnäs-Sweden), Hopkins and Officer [74] (min: 35 cm and max: 103 cm), and Mondain-Monval and Sharp [75] (min: 30 cm and max: 100 cm, Whittington, Lancashire, United Kingdom). We assumed that differences in colony locations (lakeshore vs. river banks vs. artificial nest locations) could contribute to these differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%