1936
DOI: 10.1017/s001675680009405x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spilitic Rocks in New Zealand

Abstract: Prior to a discovery made recently by the writer, of spilitic rocks at Great King Island, the largest member of the Three Kings group of islands, about 26 miles north-west of the north-west extremity of the mainland of New Zealand, such rocks had not previously been found in this latter country. Some account of the types represented at Great King Island may therefore be welcome, particularly since Gilluly's (1935) recent comprehensive paper has focused attention on spilites and their associations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been very little work at even the simplest of levels on matching conglomerate pebbles with igneous outcrops. The conglomerate pebbles examined by Marshall (1904) at Nelson, Mackie (1935) and Watters (1952) in Southland, and Marwick (1946) and Bartrum (1935) in Auckland have not been satisfactorily matched with their sources, and we still await exhaustive studies of variation and alteration in large granitic bodies. Other workers have been too quick to seize on a source, forgetting the warning sounded by Bell, Webb, and Clarke (1907, p. 44); and repeated by Benson and Bartrum (1935, p. 109), and Reed (1958a) that even the oldest of New Zealand sediments have been derived from granites.…”
Section: Radiometric Datesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been very little work at even the simplest of levels on matching conglomerate pebbles with igneous outcrops. The conglomerate pebbles examined by Marshall (1904) at Nelson, Mackie (1935) and Watters (1952) in Southland, and Marwick (1946) and Bartrum (1935) in Auckland have not been satisfactorily matched with their sources, and we still await exhaustive studies of variation and alteration in large granitic bodies. Other workers have been too quick to seize on a source, forgetting the warning sounded by Bell, Webb, and Clarke (1907, p. 44); and repeated by Benson and Bartrum (1935, p. 109), and Reed (1958a) that even the oldest of New Zealand sediments have been derived from granites.…”
Section: Radiometric Datesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The schists have also been altered by the intrusion of pegmatite dikes, and finally changed by retrogressive metamorphism, perhaps during the Lower Cretaceous orogeny, a little after the intrusion of the peridotites. In 1935 (b, p. 348) Turner postponed the date of metamorphism till the Late Permian or first half of the Triassic, noting F. W. Hutton's assertion of unconformity between the Permian and Triassic, and the presence of schist and hornfels pebbles (Turner, 1938d, p. 161) in Mesozoic rocks (Bartrum, 1935;Mackie, 1936). The age of the original sediment was given as Lower Ordovician to perhaps Lake Paleozoic (Turner, 1938d).…”
Section: Turner and Huttonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, the Green River Formation contains more sodium than potassium (Milton and Eugster, 1959)- Kinkel et al, 1956;Colernan and Peterman, 1975;and Brown et al, 1979), keratophyres (Gilluly, 1935? Bartrum, 1929, 1936Battey, 1955;Albers, 1959;Dickinson, 1962;and Brown et al, 1979)> and sodic gneisses of the Reading Prong (Drake, 1969;Bayley, 1941;Baker and Buddington, 1970;and Sims, 1958). …”
Section: -60mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keratophyres (Gilluly, 1935;Bartrum, 1929Bartrum, , 1936Battey, 1955;Albers, 1959;Dickinson, 19^2;Brown et al, 1979) Albite granites and plagiogranites (Kinkel et al, 1956;Coleman and Peterman, 1975;Brown et al, 1979) Argillites of the Lockatong Formation (Van Houten, 1965) Q AlhLte-oligoclase granites from the Reading Prong (Drake, 19^9;Baker and Buddington, 1970;Sims, 1958) Oligoclase-quartz gneisses from the Reading Prong (Drake, 19^9;Baker and Buddington, 1970;Sims, 1958) …”
Section: Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than tholeiitic basalt, the most common volcanic rocks associated with geosynclinal sediments are spilites and keratophyres. These presumably related rocks are common in the Paleozoic geosynclinal sections of Europe, as the basal volcanic rocks of island arc areas such as the Virgin Islands , and in other oceanic margin environments such as New Zealand (Bartrum, 1936). Spilites and keratophyres are reportedly absent in the early Precambrian (for example, see Glikson, 1970;Anhaeusser and others, 1969), but such negative evidence is not positive proof.…”
Section: *Frommentioning
confidence: 99%