2011
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2853-10.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spike-Train Communities: Finding Groups of Similar Spike Trains

Abstract: Identifying similar spike-train patterns is a key element in understanding neural coding and computation. For single neurons, similar spike patterns evoked by stimuli are evidence of common coding. Across multiple neurons, similar spike trains indicate potential cell assemblies. As recording technology advances, so does the urgent need for grouping methods to make sense of large-scale datasets of spike trains. Existing methods require specifying the number of groups in advance, limiting their use in explorator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods reviewed here can be applied to large neuronal populations, and neuronal activity is assessed as a whole through the use of eigenvalue analysis. Additionally, the Marčenko-Pastur distribution opens the possibility of using an analytical and reliable statistics instead of surrogate methods employed in previous frameworks (Abeles, 2009;Abeles and Gat, 2001;Abeles and Gerstein, 1988;Humphries, 2011;Maldonado et al, 2008;Shmiel et al, 2006). In addition to being computationally demanding, a problem inherent to the use of surrogates is the fact that there is no consensus about which statistical properties should be preserved in these control data (Berger et al, 2010;Grun, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods reviewed here can be applied to large neuronal populations, and neuronal activity is assessed as a whole through the use of eigenvalue analysis. Additionally, the Marčenko-Pastur distribution opens the possibility of using an analytical and reliable statistics instead of surrogate methods employed in previous frameworks (Abeles, 2009;Abeles and Gat, 2001;Abeles and Gerstein, 1988;Humphries, 2011;Maldonado et al, 2008;Shmiel et al, 2006). In addition to being computationally demanding, a problem inherent to the use of surrogates is the fact that there is no consensus about which statistical properties should be preserved in these control data (Berger et al, 2010;Grun, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By consequence, PCA-based methods would falsely identify two assemblies in the network, while only one pair of neurons is correlated. It should be noted that other methods, such as the one described in Humphries (2011), can be adapted to other measures of spike train similarity besides linear correlations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been developed to partition data sets into ensembles of neurons having significantly correlated firing patterns (Feldt et al 2009;Humphries 2011;Lopes-dos-Santos et al 2011;Lyttle and Fellous 2011;Gerstein et al 2012). Our laboratory has used an unsupervised graph theoretic-based clustering approach to reveal the existence of physically segregated ensembles of neurons that are re-identifiable across preparations during the Aplysia locomotion motor program ( Fig.…”
Section: Vertebrate Enteric Gangliamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past decades have seen the arrival of many methods that can characterize spike timing networks (Abeles and Gerstein, 1988; Chapin and Nicolelis, 1999; Nádasdy et al, 1999; Tetko and Villa, 2001; Grün et al, 2002; Lee and Wilson, 2002; Schnitzer and Meister, 2003; Ikegaya et al, 2004; Okatan et al, 2005; Schneider et al, 2006; Nikolíc, 2007; Pipa et al, 2008; Schrader et al, 2008; Berger et al, 2010; Eldawlatly et al, 2010; Louis et al, 2010; Peyrache et al, 2010; Humphries, 2011; Lopes-dos-Santos et al, 2011; Gansel and Singer, 2012; Torre et al, 2016). Their application has led to important insights, yet they have several limitations, especially when it comes to their application on large scale neuronal recordings (Buzsáki, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%