2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00422-002-0361-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spike timing dependent synaptic plasticity in biological systems

Abstract: Association of a presynaptic spike with a postsynaptic spike can lead to changes in synaptic efficacy that are highly dependent on the relative timing of the pre- and postsynaptic spikes. Different synapses show varying forms of such spike-timing dependent learning rules. This review describes these different rules, the cellular mechanisms that may be responsible for them, and the computational consequences of these rules for information processing and storage in the nervous system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical studies of the dynamics of neural networks have contributed to our understanding of how these networks might function [1,2]. Recent progress in the study of synaptic plasticity is opening up new opportunities for understanding how these networks can form [3,4,5]. One of the most important aspects of a functional neural network is that the strength of its connections can change in response to the history of its activities, that is, it can learn from experience [6,7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical studies of the dynamics of neural networks have contributed to our understanding of how these networks might function [1,2]. Recent progress in the study of synaptic plasticity is opening up new opportunities for understanding how these networks can form [3,4,5]. One of the most important aspects of a functional neural network is that the strength of its connections can change in response to the history of its activities, that is, it can learn from experience [6,7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolution of synaptic weights versus time as well as the final synaptic weight distributions after learning may again provide key insights. In particular, it is not clear from the results whether synaptic learning is additive (weight change does not depend on actual synaptic weight), or multiplicative (in which learning is a function of the weight) [9], [39], [40]. The latter seems more plausible based on the operation principle of these circuits, in that the conductance of the reverse current path through the memristor certainly depends on the instantaneous weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Various modifications as a function of pulse timing have been reported for different synapses. [19][20][21] For example, in hippocampal neurons, potentiation (increase) of the synaptic strength is observed when the post-follows the presynaptic pulse, while depression (decrease) occurs when the pre-follows the postsynaptic pulse (asymmetric Hebbian learning). 16 This functionality can be successfully emulated with memristors 4,[22][23][24][25][26] and, empirically, it is described with exponential functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%