1961
DOI: 10.1038/191200a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spike and Wave Discharges and Alterations of Conscious Awareness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,72 Furthermore, types of motor symptoms correlate with regions most involved by spikes, that is, the frontal eye field and frontal motor areas responsible for eyelid fluttering and mild myoclonic jerks. First, motor signs occur synchronous to the spikes.…”
Section: Clinical Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,72 Furthermore, types of motor symptoms correlate with regions most involved by spikes, that is, the frontal eye field and frontal motor areas responsible for eyelid fluttering and mild myoclonic jerks. First, motor signs occur synchronous to the spikes.…”
Section: Clinical Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AS themselves can have a variable effect on consciousness both within and between seizures in an individual (11, 12). Furthermore, variable aspects of a patient’s cognition may be impaired suggesting that selective brain networks may be involved during AS (11, 13). Exactly what the mechanism involved in the disruption of cognition is unclear; however, it has been speculated that focal involvement of bilateral frontal association cortex disrupts normal processing leading to impairment of specific cognitive functions (11).…”
Section: Clinicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the EEG recordings of chickens following electrical stunning often differ from those of mammals in that the epileptic activity more closely resembles a petit mal seizure (Gregory & Wotton, 1987), a milder form of epileptic attack in humans (Gregory, 1986). These kinds of seizures are not associated with immediate unconsciousness in humans (Goldie & Green, 1961;Porter & Penry, 1973), and this is one of many lines of evidence, further discussed later, to suggest that electrical stunning does not produce immediate unconsciousness in all birds (Boyd, 1994;Gregory, 1986;Gregory & Wotton, 1987;Raj, 2003). However, because the brain of a chicken responds to electrical stunning differently from the brain of a mammal (Raj, 2003), the subjective experiences of a bird and a mammal may also differ during a petit mal seizure.…”
Section: Electrical Water-bath Stunning Efficacymentioning
confidence: 86%