Handbook of Bayesian Variable Selection 2021
DOI: 10.1201/9781003089018-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spike-and-Slab Meets LASSO: A Review of the Spike-and-Slab LASSO

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spike-and-slab LASSO (SSLASSO) was proposed by Ročková and George (2018) . It is based on the idea that every penalized likelihood has a Bayesian interpretation ( Bai et al, 2021 ). For instance, the LASSO penalization is equivalent to a Laplace distribution regulated by hyperparameter , where the posterior mode of is as follows: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spike-and-slab LASSO (SSLASSO) was proposed by Ročková and George (2018) . It is based on the idea that every penalized likelihood has a Bayesian interpretation ( Bai et al, 2021 ). For instance, the LASSO penalization is equivalent to a Laplace distribution regulated by hyperparameter , where the posterior mode of is as follows: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bayesian prior can be rearranged in a penalized likelihood context by taking this marginal logarithm as a prior ( Bai et al, 2021 ); after some derivation, the following can be obtained: where …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) such that a degenerate Dirac distribution about zero is chosen for the spike part. Point-mass priors have favorable statistical properties [e.g., Johnstone andSilverman, 2004, Castillo andvan der Vaart, 2012] but can be computationally prohibitive [Bai et al, 2021]. We hope to extend our algorithms to point-mass priors in follow-up work.…”
Section: For Linear Regression)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this knowledge gap, two algorithms previously not used for clustering a groundwater geochemical dataset were selected; Gaussian finite mixture modeling (GFMM) (Scrucca et al 2016) and spike‐and‐slab Bayesian model (SSB) (Partovi Nia and Davison 2012). Successful applications of GFMM (e.g., Ellefsen et al 2014; Ellefsen and Smith 2016; Scrucca 2016; Marbac et al 2017; Popp et al 2019; Saranya et al 2020; Zhou and Wang 2020), and SSB (e.g., Tadesse et al 2005; Partovi Nia 2009; Partovi Nia and Davison 2012; Anderson and Vehtari 2017; Canale et al 2017; Cao et al 2019; Bai et al 2021), have been widely documented for datasets other than those relating to groundwater geochemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%