Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Gujarat University Campus, Ahmedabad, India with additional description of Eilica tikaderi (Platnick, 1976)

Prajapati, Dhruv A.; Patel, Krunal; Munjpara, Sandeep B.; Jhala, Devendrasinh

doi:10.11609/jott.1835.8.11.9327-9333

Cited by 10 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among all families, Araneidae was most dominant family followed by Salticidae. Dandria et al, (2005), Siliwal et al, (2005, Namkung et al, (2009), Ursani and Soomro (2010), Khan (2011), Perveen and Jamal (2012), Sial et al, (2012), Adarsh and Nameer (2015), Lawania and Trigunayat (2015), Perveen and Khan (2015), Adarsh and Nameer (2016), Ghazanfar et al, (2016) and Prajapati et al, (2016). The present compilation was also more or less similar in accordance with the earlier checklist, as most of the families and species were found in these checklist.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 88%

Pictorial Checklist of Agrobiont Spiders of Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India

Prajapati¹,

Patel²,

Surani³

2018

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study on biodiversity of agrobiont spiders was carried out at N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University (NAU) campus Navsari, Gujarat, India. A total 48 species of agrobiont spiders were recorded belonging to 34 genera and 12 families from different ecosystems i.e., paddy, sugarcane, maize, mango and banana. Among them 33.33 per cent species belongs to family Araneidae, 29.17 per cent from Salticidae, 8.33 per cent species belongs to family Oxyopidae, 6.25 per cent species belongs to family Clubionidae, 4.17 per cent species belongs to Tetragnathidae, Sparassidae as well as Theridiidae of each, whereas remaining 2.08 per cent species from Thomisidae, Uloboridae, Lycosidae, Hersiliidae, and Scytodidae of each and prepared the pictorial checklist of 48 species of agrobiont spiders.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 88%

Pictorial Checklist of Agrobiont Spiders of Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India

Prajapati¹,

Patel²,

Surani³

2018

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The present study therefore, emphasized on systematic collection covering all habitat zones in Gujarat as a result of which we have come up with many interesting records of spiders. 183 Lycosidae Pardosa mysorensis (Tikader & Malhotra, 1980Y Prajapati et al 2016c 184 Lycosidae Pardosa pseudoannulata (Bösenberg & Strand, 1906 Patel 1971;Siliwal 2000;Siliwal et al 2003a;Anonymous 2009;Kumar & Yashkamal 2011;Solanki 2016;Prajapati et al 2016c 282 Salticidae Phlegra dhakuriensis (Tikader, 1974 Siliwal 2000;Patel & Vyas 2001;Siliwal et al 2003b;Patel 2003;Anonymous 2009;Trivedi 2009;Kumar & Yashkamal 2011;Bhatt 2014;Solanki & Kumar 2014;Solanki 2016;Prajapati et al 2016c 285 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

<b>Spiders of Gujarat: a preliminary checklist</b>

Yadav¹,

Solanki²,

Siliwal³

et al. 2017

J. Threat. Taxa

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a very first attempt to compile a checklist of spiders from Gujarat. It is a result of primary data as well as based on published literature. The spider diversity of Gujarat consists of 415 species under 169 genera and 40 families. Out of these, 29 genera and 17 families are endemic to Gujarat. Overall, high spider diversity was recorded from zone III with 33 families, 132 genera and 278 species. Whereas, the zone with the least spider records was zone VI with only 16 families, 39 genera and 70 species. This is an under estimated number and many new records as well as new species are expected as a result of more systematic studies on spiders in this region.

show abstract

“… Andhra Pradesh (Palem et al, 2016)  Assam (Tikader, 1982;Singh et al, 2012;Saha et al, 2015;Basumatary and Brahma, 2017;Ahmed, 2018)  Chhattisgarh (Kujur and Ekka, 2016;Ekka and Kujur, 2015)  Gujarat (Tikader, 1982;Patel and Vyas, 2001;Siliwal et al, 2003a, b;Patel, 2003b;Prajapati et al, 2016;Yadav et al, 2017)  Karnataka (Tikader, 1982;Kokilamani et al, 2019)  Kerala (Subramanian, 1955;Sebastian et al, 2005b;Sunil Jose et al, 2008;Mathew et al, 2014;Malamel and Sudhikumar, 2020)  Madhya Pradesh (Gajbe, 2003a(Gajbe, , b, 2004aPatil, 2012;Sharma and Sharma, 2015)  Maharashtra (Rithe, 2012;Keswani, 2013;More and Sawant, 2013;Misal et al, 2019)  Meghalaya (Nakambam et al, 2021)  Mizoram (Biswas and Biswas, 2007;Chowdhury et al, 2017)  Odisha  Sikkim (Tikader, 1982;Biswas and Biswas, 2007)  Tamil Nadu (Kapoor, 2008;Dharmaraj et al, 2018;Caleb, 2020a)  Uttar Pradesh (Hore and Uniyal, 2008a, b;Uniyal and Hore, 20...…”

Section: Cyclosa Confraga (Thorell 1892)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Assam (Singh et al, 2012;Saha et al, 2015;Basumatary and Brahma, 2017)  Chhattisgarh (Gajbe and Sharma, 1994;Gajbe, 2003bGajbe, , 2005Ekka and Kujur, 2015)  Delhi (Malik et al, 2015)  Goa (Bastawade and Borkar, 2008)  Gujarat (Parmar, 2013;Prajapati et al, 2016;Yadav et al, 2017;Yadav and Kumar, 2019)  Karnataka (Murali et al, 2017;Nautiyal et al, 2017;Tabasum et al, 2018)  Kerala (Sudhikumar et al, 2005a;Sunil Jose et al, 2008;Adarsh and Nameer, 2016;Joseph et al, 2017;Jose et al, 2018)  Madhya Pradesh (Gajbe, 1995a(Gajbe, , b, 2003b(Gajbe, , 2005Gajbe and Singh, 1994;Sharma et al, 2010)  Maharashtra (Tikader, 1982;Gajbe, 2005;Bastawade, 2006Bastawade, , 2008Rithe, 2012;More and Sawant, 2013;Nerlekar et al, 2016;Dixit and Ade, 2017;Shirbhate and Shirbhate, 2017)  Meghalaya (Nakambam et al, 2021)  Odisha  Rajasthan (Jangid et al, 2019)  Tamil Nadu (Krishnaveni and Kandeepan, 2019; Caleb, 2020a)  Uttar Pradesh (Chandra et al, 2021)  Uttarakhand…”

Section: Cyclosa Hexatuberculata Tikader 1982mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Vairale and Wagh, 2021)  Sikkim (Tikader, 1982;Roy et al, 2017a)  Tamil Nadu (Kapoor, 2008;Krishnaveni and Kandeepan, 2019)  Uttar Pradesh (Hore and Uniyal, 2008a, b;Uniyal and Hore, 2009)  Uttarakhand (Biswas and Biswas, 2010)  West Bengal (Biswas and Biswas, 1992;Kundu and Raychaudhuri, 1997;Roy et al, 2009Roy et al, , 2010Sen et al, 2009bSen et al, , 2015Raychaudhuri et al, 2016; 104. Cyclosa spirifera Simon, 1889  Arunachal Pradesh (Biswas and Biswas, 2006;Caleb and Kumar, 2018)  Assam (Hazarika and Chakraborti, 1998;Singh et al, 2012;Saha et al, 2015)  Chhattisgarh (Gajbe, 2003b(Gajbe, , 2004a  Goa (Pandit and Pai, 2017;Pandit and Dharwadkar, 2020)  Gujarat (Bhatt, 2014;Prajapati et al, 2016;Yadav et al, 2017;Solanki et al, 2020)  Karnataka (Nalini Bai and Ravindranatha, 2012)  Kerala (Sunil Jose et al, 2008;Adarsh and Nameer, 2016;Sumesh and Sudhikumar, 2020)  Madhya Pradesh (Gajbe, 2003a(Gajbe, , b, 2004aSharma et al, 2010;Patil, 2012)  Maharashtra (Rithe, 2012;Keswani, 2013;More an...…”

Section: Cyclosa Oatesi (Thorell 1892)*mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Faunal diversity of orb-weaver spiders (Araneidae: Araneomorphae: Araneae: Arachnida) in India

Singh¹,

Singh²

2021

IJBEI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review deals with the species diversity of the orb-weaving spiders (Araneidae: Araneae: Arachnida) in different states of India and the union territories. A total of 256 species belonging to 49 genera of Araneidae were recorded in all states and the union territories of India except for Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu, out of which 99 species (38.4%) were strictly endemic. Two genera of orb-weaver spiders are highly speciose, e.g. Araneus Clerck, 1757 (39 species) and Neoscona Simon, 1864 (36 species). About 119 species of these orb-weaver spiders were recorded from Maharashtra followed by 91 species from West Bengal, 81 species from Kerala, 79 species from Karnataka, 75 species from Gujarat, 71 species from Tamil Nadu, 65 species from Assam, 63 species from Uttar Pradesh, 58 species from Uttarakhand, 57 species from Madhya Pradesh, 47 species each from Odisha and Jammu and Kashmir, 41 species from Meghalaya, 34 species from Chhattisgarh, 32 species from Goa, 31 species from Rajasthan, 29 species from Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 27 species from Andhra Pradesh, 24 species from Sikkim, 21 species each from Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Tripura, and less than 20 species were recorded from other states and union territories. Seven species are distributed in more than 20 states and union territories, viz. Argiope pulchella Thorell, 1881 (23 states, 3 union territories); Nephila pilipes (Fabricius, 1793) (24 states, 2 union territory); Neoscona mukerjei Tikader, 1980 (23 states, 1 union territory); Neoscona theisi (Walckenaer, 1837) (21 states, 3 union territories); Araneus mitificus (Simon, 1886) (21 states, 3 union territories); Argiope aemula (Walckenaer, 1837) (21 states, 2 union territories) and Eriovixia excelsa (Simon, 1889) (20 states, 2 union territories). Several species of Araneidae reported from India are recorded only from one state or from the type locality. Hence, intensive and extensive faunistic surveys for these spiders are required throughou

show abstract

Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Gujarat University Campus, Ahmedabad, India with additional description of Eilica tikaderi (Platnick, 1976)

Cited by 10 publications

References 7 publications

Pictorial Checklist of Agrobiont Spiders of Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India

Pictorial Checklist of Agrobiont Spiders of Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India

<b>Spiders of Gujarat: a preliminary checklist</b>

Faunal diversity of orb-weaver spiders (Araneidae: Araneomorphae: Araneae: Arachnida) in India

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About