2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-023-10446-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spider wasp optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SWO has three control parameters, namely, the TR tradeoff rate, the CR crossover probability, and the N SWO m minimum population size. The values given in the original article, [54] 0.3 for TR, 0.2 for CR, and 20 for N SWO m are used.…”
Section: Swomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SWO has three control parameters, namely, the TR tradeoff rate, the CR crossover probability, and the N SWO m minimum population size. The values given in the original article, [54] 0.3 for TR, 0.2 for CR, and 20 for N SWO m are used.…”
Section: Swomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time utilization of WLS, SWO, RECAA, FFA, KOA, and RIME algorithms are given by Equations ( 33)-( 38), respectively. The computational time depends on the number of populations (N WLS ) and number of dimensions (D) in WLS algorithm, [53] number of populations (N SWO ), number of dimensions (D), and t SWO,max the maximum number of functions evaluation, in SWO algorithm, [54] number of populations (N RECAA ), number of dimensions (D), n s number of smart-cells, and n ne the number of neighbors per smart cell in RECAA algorithm, [56] number of populations (N FFA ), number of dimensions (D), and T FFA maximum number of iterations in FFA algorithm, [57] number of populations (N KOA ) and T KOA maximum number of iterations in KOA algorithm, [58] and lastly the number of populations (N RIME ) in RIME algorithm. [59] The computational time results in seconds for 30 runs in solving the PV parameter extraction problem are given in Table 14.…”
Section: Computational Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other notable examples include the Shuffled Frog-Leaping Algorithm (SFLA) [44], which simulates the memeinspired problem-solving strategy of frogs, and the Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) [45], derived from the nutrient foraging behavior of slime molds. The Spider Wasp Optimization (SWO) [46] and the Border Collie Optimization (BCO) [47] also take cues from the predatory tactics of spider wasps and the herding strategy of border collies, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are also several studies trying to improve the heuristic algorithms of transport systems. Abdel-Basset et al presented a new nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm named the spider wasp optimization (SWO) algorithm, which was based on replicating the hunting, nesting, and mating behaviors of the female spider wasps in nature [37]. Kaya et al aimed comparison of the performance of seven metaheuristic training algorithms in the neuro-fuzzy training for maximum power point tracking (MPPT), including particle swarm optimization (PSO), harmony search (HS), cuckoo search (CS), artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm, bee algorithm (BA), differential evolution (DE) and flower pollination algorithm (FPA) [38].…”
Section: Literature Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%