2016
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spicy Adjectives and Nominal Donkeys: Capturing Semantic Deviance Using Compositionality in Distributional Spaces

Abstract: Sophisticated senator and legislative onion. Whether or not you have ever heard of these things, we all have some intuition that one of them makes much less sense than the other. In this paper, we introduce a large dataset of human judgments about novel adjective-noun phrases. We use these data to test an approach to semantic deviance based on phrase representations derived with compositional distributional semantic methods, that is, methods that derive word meanings from contextual information, and approximat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A particularly exciting application of compositional distributional methods is that of Vecchi et al (2017), who showed that distributional models are able to distinguish between semantically acceptable and unacceptable adjective-noun phrases. Crucially, their data involves phrases that are unattested in a very large corpus; some phrases are unattested because they are semantically anomalous (angry lamp, legislative onion), and some due to the generative capacity of language, with its explosion of combinatory properties, together with the properties of the world, which make some combinations of adjectives and nouns unlikely even if they are perfectly acceptable (warm garlic, sophisticated senator ).…”
Section: Single Representation Polysemy Via Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly exciting application of compositional distributional methods is that of Vecchi et al (2017), who showed that distributional models are able to distinguish between semantically acceptable and unacceptable adjective-noun phrases. Crucially, their data involves phrases that are unattested in a very large corpus; some phrases are unattested because they are semantically anomalous (angry lamp, legislative onion), and some due to the generative capacity of language, with its explosion of combinatory properties, together with the properties of the world, which make some combinations of adjectives and nouns unlikely even if they are perfectly acceptable (warm garlic, sophisticated senator ).…”
Section: Single Representation Polysemy Via Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [103][104][105][106] Words with many semantic or associative neighbors are less likely to be remembered in a free recall task and cued recall tasks, trigger lower feelings of knowing, and are more likely to be accepted in new word combinations. [23,[107][108][109] Words with high phonological clustering are more difficult to identify in spoken word recognition and lexical decision tasks whereas high associative clustering are remembered better in a cued recall task.…”
Section: Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on cognitive science also benefits greatly from DSMs (Jones & Mewhort, 2007; Jones, Willits, & Dennis, 2015). Word vectors have been demonstrated to explain a number of cognitive phenomena relevant to semantic memory or the mental lexicon, such as word association (Jones, Gruenenfelder, & Recchia, 2018; Utsumi, 2015), semantic priming (Mandera, Keuleers, & Brysbaert, 2017), semantic transparency (Marelli & Baroni, 2015), and conceptual combination (Vecchi, Marelli, Zamparelli, & Baroni, 2017). In cognitive research on concepts, in particular on embodied versus symbolic processing, DSM is regarded as a de facto standard language model (Bolognesi & Steen, 2018; de Vega, Glenberg, & Graesser, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%