2007
DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.107.159228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 2 Negatively Regulates Neointimal Formation in Mouse Arteries

Abstract: Abstract-Neointimal lesion formation was induced in sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor 2 (S1P 2 )-null and wild-type mice by ligation of the left carotid artery. After 28 days, large neointimal lesions developed in S1P 2 -null but not in wild-type arteries. This was accompanied with a significant increase in both medial and intimal smooth muscle cell (SMC) replication between days 4 to 28, with only minimal replication in wild-type arteries. S1P 2 -null SMCs showed a significant increase in migration when … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
48
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these, administration of a S1P 1 /S1P 3 antagonist in rats inhibited neointima formation after balloon injury of the carotid 34 and neointima formation after carotid ligation was enhanced in S1P 2 Ϫ/Ϫ mice. 17 The potent inhibition of PDGF-BB-induced migration by S1P and its lack of effect on basal migration that we see in our study confirm previous in vitro reports. 18,28,35 The absent effect of S1P on proliferation has also been described before e. g. for human SMCs, 18 although an enhanced proliferation by S1P has also been described for rat SMCs, where an S1P 1 /S1P 3 inhibitor prevented it but did not alter basal proliferation.…”
Section: Keul Et Al S1p 3 and Macrophage Recruitment In Atherosclerossupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these, administration of a S1P 1 /S1P 3 antagonist in rats inhibited neointima formation after balloon injury of the carotid 34 and neointima formation after carotid ligation was enhanced in S1P 2 Ϫ/Ϫ mice. 17 The potent inhibition of PDGF-BB-induced migration by S1P and its lack of effect on basal migration that we see in our study confirm previous in vitro reports. 18,28,35 The absent effect of S1P on proliferation has also been described before e. g. for human SMCs, 18 although an enhanced proliferation by S1P has also been described for rat SMCs, where an S1P 1 /S1P 3 inhibitor prevented it but did not alter basal proliferation.…”
Section: Keul Et Al S1p 3 and Macrophage Recruitment In Atherosclerossupporting
confidence: 92%
“…16 Lesion area and vessel area in the aortic root were calculated from 4 consecutive 5-m sections of 40 m apart over the entire root. The left carotid artery was ligated at the bifurcation as previously described 17 and serially sectioned over its entire length 4 weeks after surgery. Every 10th section starting at the ligation site was stained with H&E and neointimal and medial areas and neointimal cells were quantified by histomorphometry.…”
Section: Quantification Of Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies by Reidy and colleagues 20,21 provided evidence showing that Figure 5. Inhibition of the S1P1 and S1P3 receptors increases S1P-induced H4Ac and SRF enrichment of the SM␣-actin and SMMHC CArG promoter region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 In contrast, exciting recent studies by Reidy and colleagues revealed that carotid neointimal hyperplasia is increased in response to ligation in mice that are null for the S1P2 receptor and that mouse lines with higher levels of S1P1 mRNA, ie, FVB mice, show increased neointimal hyperplasia compared to C57/Bl6 mice. 20,21 Taken together, the general paradigm that has emerged is that S1P1 regulates SMC proliferation and migration whereas S1P2 has opposing actions. However, given observations by Proia et al 19,22 that S1P receptors play a critical role in vascular development, one must also consider the possibility that enhanced neointimal formation in S1P2 null mice may also be attributable to secondary adaptive changes in gene expression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%