Sphingobacterium gen. nov., Sphingobacterium spiritivorum comb. nov., Sphingobacterium multivorum comb. nov., Sphingobacterium mizutae sp. nov., and Flavobacterium indologenes sp. nov.: Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Rods in CDC Groups IIK-2 and IIb

Yabuuchi, Eiko; Kaneko, Tadaaki; Yano, Ikuya; Moss, C W; Miyoshi, Norihiro

doi:10.1099/00207713-33-3-580

Cited by 295 publications

(180 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

162

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1) (28). These data also support the transfer of F. thalpophilum and F. mizutaii to the genus Sphingobacterium as Sphingobacterium thalpophilum and Sphingobacterium mizutae, respectively; these transfers were based mainly on the results of chemotaxonomic studies (21,29,37).…”

supporting

confidence: 71%

“…The Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology denied this request as there was no great potential for confusion if F. aquatile was retained, nor were strong arguments for rejecting this type species found in the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (35). In subsequent taxonomic studies, new Flavobacterium species were described, whereas other were removed and included in new genera (8,14,17,21,24,29,34,37).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most recent review of the taxonomy of the flavobacteria (29,37). Finally, two species, formerly known as Centers for Disease Control groups IIf and IIj, constitute a fourth group, for which a separate genus has been proposed (19,20); these taxa are now known as Weeksella virosa, the type species, and Weeksella zoohelcum, respectively (19,20).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

NOTES: New Perspectives in the Classification of the Flavobacteria: Description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev.

Vandamme

Bernardet

Segers

et al. 1994

International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology

427

345

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

NOTESOur present knowledge concerning the genotypic, chemotaxonomic, and phenotypic characteristics of members of the genus Flavobacterium and some related genera, including the genus Weekella, was used to revise the classification of these organisms. The generically misclassified organisms Flavobacterium balustinum, Flavobacterium gleum, Flavobacterium indologenes, Flavobacterium indoltheticum, Flavobacterium meningosepticum, and Flavobacterium scophthalmurn are included in a new genus, Chryseobacterium, with Chryseobacterium gleum as the type species. The generically misclassified organism Flavobacterium breve is included in the revived genus Empedobacter as Empedobacter brevis, whereas the generically misclassified organism W e e k e h zoohelcum is included in the new genus Bergeyella as Bergeyella zoohelcum.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 71%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

NOTES: New Perspectives in the Classification of the Flavobacteria: Description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev.

Vandamme

Bernardet

Segers

et al. 1994

International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology

427

345

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The cells of species in this Class are gramnegative, non-spore-forming, straight rods that have no flagella but may exhibit sliding motility. Acid is produced from carbohydrates oxidatively but not fermentatively (Yabuuchi et al, 1983). Niastela sp.…”

Section: Identification Of Microorganisms Possibly Responsible For Lamentioning

confidence: 99%

Las degradation in a fluidized bed reactor and phylogenetic characterization of the biofilm

Oliveira

Costa

Sakamoto

et al. 2013

Braz. J. Chem. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-A fluidized bed reactor was used to study the degradation of the surfactant linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS). The reactor was inoculated with anaerobic sludge and was fed with a synthetic substrate supplemented with LAS in increasing concentrations (8.2 to 45.8 mg l -1 ). The removal efficiency of 93% was obtained after 270 days of operation. Subsequently, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the sample at the last stage of the reactor operation recovered 105 clones belonging to the domain Bacteria. These clones represented a variety of phyla with significant homology to Bacteroidetes (40%), Proteobacteria (42%), Verrucomicrobia (4%), Acidobacteria (3%), Firmicutes (2%), and Gemmatimonadetes (1%). A small fraction of the clones (8%) was not related to any phylum. Such phyla variety indicated the role of microbial consortia in degrading the surfactant LAS.

show abstract

“…Aspergillus japonicus asperparalines bioactive compound [5,6,7] chanoclavine-I ergot alkaloids intermediate [8] cycloclavin ergot alkaloid [9] ergot alkaloids mycotoxin [8] festuclavine ergot alkaloid [9] neoxaline alkaloid [10,11] ochratoxin A mycotoxin [12] preparaherquamide alkaloid [13] secalonic acid F mycotoxin [14,15] sterigmatocystin mycotoxin [16] Aspergillus melleus aspyrone nematicidal activity [17] mellamide insecticidal activity [18] ochratoxin A mycotoxin [18] viomellin bioactive compound [18] xanthomegnin bioactive compound [18] Aspergillus niger anthraquinones bioactive compound [19] asperenone bioactive compound [20] aspernigerin bioactive compound [21] aspernigrins bioactive compound [22] Database on potential toxigenic capacities of microorganisms used for industrial production…”

Section: Microorganism Secondary Metabolites Commentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Database on the taxonomical characterisation and potential toxigenic capacities of microorganisms used for the industrial production of food enzymes and feed additives, which do not have a recommendation for Qualified Presumption of Safety

Benito

Ibáñez

Moncho

et al. 2017

EFSA Supporting Publications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present work constitutes the external scientific report of the EFSA open call OC/EFSA/FEED/2015/01. The aim of the call was to provide EFSA with a database from a review on the taxonomical description and potential toxigenic capacities of microorganisms used for the industrial production of feed additives and food enzymes. The review includes microorganisms used as source of feed additives and food enzymes for which EFSA has received or can potentially receive applications for safety assessment, and which have not been recommended for Qualified Presumption of Safety status. The database also comprises the molecular taxonomical identifiers and biosynthetic pathways involved in the production of toxic compounds and the responsible genes. The main result of the project is shown as a database developed according to the EFSA data structure. The methodological aspects and the queries used in the systematic search, as well as the procedure applied for the screening of scientific documents retrieved are described in this report. Details are available in supplementary appendices.In total, 22970 scientific documents were screened in the literature search, from which 411 were initially selected for providing pertinent data for the scope of the project. From the review of the selected articles, 474 bioactive secondary metabolites were recorded and 59 compounds were further studied in order to obtain data on their toxicology and the conditions in which they are produced by the microorganisms used in industrial fermentations. The database generated in this project comprises details that characterise, when available, the production conditions, genes involved and toxicity of these 59 compounds. This provides information that can be used to establish safety measures when using potentially toxigenic microorganisms in industrial fermentations Disclaimer: The present document has been produced and adopted by the bodies identified above as author(s). This task has been carried out exclusively by the author(s) in the context of a contract between the European Food Safety Authority and the author(s), awarded following a tender procedure. The present document is published complying with the transparency principle to which the Authority is subject. It may not be considered as an output adopted by the Authority. The European Food Safety Authority reserves its rights, view and position as regards the issues addressed and the conclusions reached in the present document, without prejudice to the rights of the authors. Acknowledgements:We thank the following EFSA satff: Jaime Aguilera, Margarita Aguilera-Gómez, Jane Richardson, Mario Monguidi and Davide Gibin for their valuable help and collaboration throughout the project. We also would like to thank the members of AINIA: Sonia Porta, Lidia Tomás, Joaquin Espí and Juan Antonio Nieto for providing expertise in biotechnology and molecular biology and contributing with their efforts to achieve the goals of this project, and Violeta Gómez from the University of Navarra for her colla...

show abstract

Sphingobacterium gen. nov., Sphingobacterium spiritivorum comb. nov., Sphingobacterium multivorum comb. nov., Sphingobacterium mizutae sp. nov., and Flavobacterium indologenes sp. nov.: Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Rods in CDC Groups IIK-2 and IIb

Cited by 295 publications

References 20 publications

NOTES: New Perspectives in the Classification of the Flavobacteria: Description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev.

NOTES: New Perspectives in the Classification of the Flavobacteria: Description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev.

Las degradation in a fluidized bed reactor and phylogenetic characterization of the biofilm

Database on the taxonomical characterisation and potential toxigenic capacities of microorganisms used for the industrial production of food enzymes and feed additives, which do not have a recommendation for Qualified Presumption of Safety

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About