2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94217-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SpheroidPicker for automated 3D cell culture manipulation using deep learning

Abstract: Recent statistics report that more than 3.7 million new cases of cancer occur in Europe yearly, and the disease accounts for approximately 20% of all deaths. High-throughput screening of cancer cell cultures has dominated the search for novel, effective anticancer therapies in the past decades. Recently, functional assays with patient-derived ex vivo 3D cell culture have gained importance for drug discovery and precision medicine. We recently evaluated the major advancements and needs for the 3D cell culture s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, several systems for the automated analysis of single spheroids have been reported (Grexa et al, 2021;Piccinini 2015;Vinci et al, 2012). Although they achieve similar or higher performance than our method, they are often validated on large (>300 µm diameter) and/or relatively immature (<7 days) spheroids (Grexa et al, 2021;Piccinini 2015;Vinci et al, 2012). Small spheroids (<150 µm) and increased maturation levels (>7 days) pose additional challenges, such as single cells/debris and low-contrast regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, several systems for the automated analysis of single spheroids have been reported (Grexa et al, 2021;Piccinini 2015;Vinci et al, 2012). Although they achieve similar or higher performance than our method, they are often validated on large (>300 µm diameter) and/or relatively immature (<7 days) spheroids (Grexa et al, 2021;Piccinini 2015;Vinci et al, 2012). Small spheroids (<150 µm) and increased maturation levels (>7 days) pose additional challenges, such as single cells/debris and low-contrast regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming when conducting highthroughput screenings. Other methods, developed for the characterization of single spheroids (Piccinini 2015;Grexa et al, 2021;Vinci et al, 2012), often exhibit more automation but lack important features such as the contact length, both spheroid widths, the intersphere angles, and doublet rotation, which have proven to be relevant to understand the complex mechanisms behind tissue fusion (Susienka et al, 2016). Moreover, these methods are often validated on immature spheroids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring of microtissue cultures and their morphometric quality profiles can be done non-invasively through imaging. Software is already available to segment and analyse microtissues in hydrogel microwells and floating cultures, even enabling selection of desirable microtissues and studying their fusion kinetics (13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Commercial microwell systems are typically produced from PCL or PDMS in different microwell shapes, which interact with light, creating complex backgrounds in brightfield images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spheroid cultures effectively resemble in vivo avascular tissue-like cellular characteristics in morphology, signal transmission, cell-cell communication, metastasis, and mechanical stimulation when compared to monolayer cultures [ 9 ]. Although several pieces of software have been created to analyze the invasive and migratory behaviors of spheroids using microscopic data, these tools can only extract particular cell morphologies at two- or three-time points during the time-lapse observation process [ [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] ]. On the other hand, researchers used to visualize the details of spheroid structures and track the status of their migration and invasion under confocal fluorescence microscopy [ [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%