1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00966954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical quadrature formulas exact to orders 25?29

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The necessary integrations have been performed using our own code, which implements Becke's partition scheme. 19 A Lebedev grid for spherical integration with 230 grid points 20 was borrowed from the DFT repository. 21 The Chebyshev scheme for radial integration with a total of 135 radial grid points has been used throughout.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessary integrations have been performed using our own code, which implements Becke's partition scheme. 19 A Lebedev grid for spherical integration with 230 grid points 20 was borrowed from the DFT repository. 21 The Chebyshev scheme for radial integration with a total of 135 radial grid points has been used throughout.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] The atom-centric radial integrals in the Becke scheme are computed using Gauss-Chebyshev quadrature of the second kind. [63] The angular integrals on each radial shell are performed by default with Lebedev quadrature, [65][66][67][68][69][70] but Lobatto quadrature [71] is available as well. The local nature of the basis functions is used to screen and select only the numerically significant functions in the formation of K DFT [72] by requiring that the absolute value of the basis function is at least = 10 −10 a.u.…”
Section: Formation Of Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative speed-up compared with the unoptimized code is shown in Table 4 for both the Lebedev and the SG-1 grids. The unoptimized code uses the default EM-GL grid (96,12,24); the default Lebedev grid of comparable accuracy (96, 194) contains a factor of 1.48 fewer points. As indicated in Table 4, the SG-1 grid of lower accuracy gives a total energy difference of 0.0095 Hartree from the EM-GL grid and a total Figure 6.…”
Section: Pruned Grid Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Most high-performance DFT codes use Lebedev spheres, which integrate spherical harmonics exactly and are well suited for the angular momentum quadrature of molecular integrals. [10][11][12][13] In the first task area, a Lebedev grid was added as well as the SG-1 grid [14] ; a pruned grid approach built off of a Lebedev grid. Two other pruned grids developed by Janssen (Personal Communication) were also added.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%