2000
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-00-01240-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund inequalities and positive quadrature

Abstract: Abstract. Geodetic and meteorological data, collected via satellites for example, are genuinely scattered and not confined to any special set of points. Even so, known quadrature formulas used in numerically computing integrals involving such data have had restrictions either on the sites (points) used or, more significantly, on the number of sites required. Here, for the unit sphere embedded in R q , we obtain quadrature formulas that are exact for spherical harmonics of a fixed order, have nonnegative weight… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
170
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the expression on the right in (15) in the series definition of K ε,n , we get this representation:…”
Section: Integral Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using the expression on the right in (15) in the series definition of K ε,n , we get this representation:…”
Section: Integral Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do the discretizations required to construct tight spherical frames in section 5, we need a strengthened version of the quadrature formula given in [14,15]. There are two reasons for this.…”
Section: Quadrature On Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, k. Note that this usually does not yet recover the coefficients a n k from (1.1) for which we denote the computed coefficientsã n k . The coefficients a n k can be obtained from values of the function f on a set of arbitrary nodes (ϑ d , ϕ d ) provided that a quadrature rule with weights w d and sufficient high degree of exactness is available (see also [5,10]). Then the sum in (1.3) changes to…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Professor Dr. Joachim Stöckler has kindly pointed out to us that our proofs [2] of the estimates (4.5) and (4.9) are valid only in the case when we do not require the quadrature weights a ξ to be nonnegative, since the Krein-Rutman extensions of nonnegative functionals are not guaranteed to be norm-preserving. The purpose of this note is to point out that the existence of nonnegative weights a ξ satisfying (4.4) necessarily implies the following analogue (0.1) of (4.5).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%