2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-016-0951-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical integral transforms of second-order gravitational tensor components onto third-order gravitational tensor components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the first measurement of radial gravitational curvatures (or gravity curvatures, GC, third-order derivatives of the gravitational potential) using the atom interferometry sensors in the laboratory condition (Rosi et al 2015), the subsequent study of the GC was focused on their theory and simulation applications in geodesy and geophysics (Šprlák and Novák 2015(Šprlák and Novák , 2017Hamáčková et al 2016;Sharifi et al 2017;Novák et al 2017;Pitoňák et al 2017Pitoňák et al , 2018Pitoňák et al , 2020Shen 2018a, b, 2019;Novák et al 2019;Du and Qiu 2019;Romeshkani et al 2020Romeshkani et al , 2021. The GC were more sensitive to field sources than the loworder gravitational effects (i.e., GP, GV, and GGT) (Heck 1984;Du and Qiu 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the first measurement of radial gravitational curvatures (or gravity curvatures, GC, third-order derivatives of the gravitational potential) using the atom interferometry sensors in the laboratory condition (Rosi et al 2015), the subsequent study of the GC was focused on their theory and simulation applications in geodesy and geophysics (Šprlák and Novák 2015(Šprlák and Novák , 2017Hamáčková et al 2016;Sharifi et al 2017;Novák et al 2017;Pitoňák et al 2017Pitoňák et al , 2018Pitoňák et al , 2020Shen 2018a, b, 2019;Novák et al 2019;Du and Qiu 2019;Romeshkani et al 2020Romeshkani et al , 2021. The GC were more sensitive to field sources than the loworder gravitational effects (i.e., GP, GV, and GGT) (Heck 1984;Du and Qiu 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous efforts have solved the singularity problem of SHEs of gravitational field elements (Balmino et al., 1990; Bettadpur, 1995; Casotto & Fantino, 2007; Eshagh, 2008, 2009; Eshagh & Sjöberg, 2009; Hotine & Morrison, 1969; Ilk, 1983; Liu et al., 2010, 2013; Petrovskaya & Vershkov, 2006, 2007, 2008; Wan, 2011; Zhu et al., 2017), whereas the same problem still exists in GVs and GGTs. The reason is that the gravitational field elements are expressed by fully normalized associated Legendre function (FNALF) (Chen et al., 2006; Fantino & Casotto, 2009; Fukushima, 2012a, 2012b; Hirt et al., 2010; Jekeli & Lee, 2007; Liu et al., 2012; Pail et al., 2011; Pavlis et al., 2012; Rummel et al., 2011; Wan & Yu, 2013; Šprlák & Novák, 2017), while the GVs and GGTs are expressed by Schmidt semi‐normalized associated Legendre function (SNALF) (Barraclough, 1974; Benton et al., 1982; Blakely, 1995; Chambodut et al., 2005; Du et al., 2015; Hemant & Maus, 2005; Huang et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2007; Kotsiaros & Olsen, 2012; Langel, 1987; Liu et al., 2019; Malin & Pocock, 1969; Quinn et al., 1986; Ravat et al., 1995; Shao et al., 1999; Wardinski & Holme, 2006), whose recursive formulae have a constant difference from those of FNALF. Although the calculation of GVs can be transformed into the non‐singular formulae developed in gravimetry, the formulae of GGTs contain the linear combinations of Legendre functions and their first‐ or second‐order derivatives, which cannot be converted simply by multiplying a constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous efforts have solved the singularity problem of SHEs of gravitational field elements (Balmino et al, 1990;Bettadpur, 1995;Casotto & Fantino, 2007;Eshagh, 2008Eshagh, , 2009Eshagh & Sjöberg, 2009;Hotine & Morrison, 1969;Ilk, 1983;Liu et al, 2010Liu et al, , 2013Petrovskaya & Vershkov, 2006, 2008Wan, 2011;Zhu et al, 2017), whereas the same problem still exists in GVs and GGTs. The reason is that the gravitational field elements are expressed by fully normalized associated Legendre function (FNALF) (Chen et al, 2006;Fantino & Casotto, 2009;Fukushima, 2012aFukushima, , 2012bHirt et al, 2010;Jekeli & Lee, 2007;Liu et al, 2012;Pail et al, 2011;Pavlis et al, 2012;Rummel et al, 2011;Wan & Yu, 2013;Šprlák & Novák, 2017), while the GVs and GGTs are expressed by Schmidt semi-normalized associated Legendre function (SNALF) (Barraclough, 1974;Benton et al, 1982;Blakely, 1995;Chambodut et al, 2005;Du et al, 2015;Hemant & Maus, 2005;Huang et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2007;Kotsiaros & Olsen, 2012;Langel, 1987;Liu et al, 2019;Malin & Pocock, 1969;Quinn et ...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%