2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical blow-ups of Grassmannians and Mori dream spaces

Abstract: In this paper we classify weak Fano varieties that can be obtained by blowing-up general points in prime Fano varieties. We also classify spherical blow-ups of Grassmannians in general points, and we compute their effective cone. These blow-ups are, in particular, Mori dream spaces. Furthermore, we compute the stable base locus decomposition of the blow-up of a Grassmannian in one point, and we show how it is determined by linear systems of hyperplanes containing the osculating spaces of the Grassmannian at th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof By [13, Lemma 6.5], we have the following characterization of the tangent space of the Grassmannian at a point false[Ufalse]double-struckGfalse(r,nfalse)$[U]\in \mathbb {G}(r,n)$: Tfalse[Ufalse](Gfalse(r,nfalse))badbreak=eI|dfalse(I,{0,,r}false)1,$$\begin{equation*} T_{[U]}(\mathbb {G}(r,n)) =\langle e_I \:|\: d(I,\lbrace 0,\dots ,r\rbrace )\leqslant 1 \rangle , \end{equation*}$$where false(e0,,enfalse)$(e_0,\dots ,e_n)$ is a basis of kn+1$k^{n+1}$, U$U$ is generated by e0,,erPn$e_0,\dots ,e_r\in \mathbb {P}^n$, eI=ei0eir$e_I = e_{i_0}\wedge \cdots \wedge e_{i_r}$ and dfalse(I,Jfalse)$d(I,J)$ is the Hamming distance between the two lists I$I$ and J$J$. Now, given false[Ufalse],false[Vfalse]double-struckGfalse(r,nfalse)$[U],[V]\in \mathbb {...…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof By [13, Lemma 6.5], we have the following characterization of the tangent space of the Grassmannian at a point false[Ufalse]double-struckGfalse(r,nfalse)$[U]\in \mathbb {G}(r,n)$: Tfalse[Ufalse](Gfalse(r,nfalse))badbreak=eI|dfalse(I,{0,,r}false)1,$$\begin{equation*} T_{[U]}(\mathbb {G}(r,n)) =\langle e_I \:|\: d(I,\lbrace 0,\dots ,r\rbrace )\leqslant 1 \rangle , \end{equation*}$$where false(e0,,enfalse)$(e_0,\dots ,e_n)$ is a basis of kn+1$k^{n+1}$, U$U$ is generated by e0,,erPn$e_0,\dots ,e_r\in \mathbb {P}^n$, eI=ei0eir$e_I = e_{i_0}\wedge \cdots \wedge e_{i_r}$ and dfalse(I,Jfalse)$d(I,J)$ is the Hamming distance between the two lists I$I$ and J$J$. Now, given false[Ufalse],false[Vfalse]double-struckGfalse(r,nfalse)$[U],[V]\in \mathbb {...…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Gpr, nq be the Grassmannian parametrizing r-planes in P n , and Gpr, nq k the blow-up of P n at k general points. These blow-ups have been studied in [MR18]. In particular the stable base locus decomposition of EffpGpr, nq 1 q has been computed in [MR18,Theorem 1.3].…”
Section: Grassmannians Blow-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These blow-ups have been studied in [MR18]. In particular the stable base locus decomposition of EffpGpr, nq 1 q has been computed in [MR18,Theorem 1.3].…”
Section: Grassmannians Blow-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%