2018
DOI: 10.1002/int.22062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical aggregation operators and their application in multiattribute group decision-making

Abstract: Spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) are a new extension of Cuong's picture fuzzy sets (PFSs). In SFSs, membership degrees satisfy the condition ≤ P x I x 0 ( ) + ( ) + 2 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
140
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, which is different from the results of the method proposed here, both in overall ranking and in best choice. Furthermore, from the Spearman's rank-correlation test, it can be inferred that the rankings produced by the methods in [32,36] are similar to that produced by the proposed method, and the ranking using methods [37,45] are uncorrelated with the ranking based on the proposed method.…”
Section: Ranking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…, which is different from the results of the method proposed here, both in overall ranking and in best choice. Furthermore, from the Spearman's rank-correlation test, it can be inferred that the rankings produced by the methods in [32,36] are similar to that produced by the proposed method, and the ranking using methods [37,45] are uncorrelated with the ranking based on the proposed method.…”
Section: Ranking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method (P1) 5 4 2 1 6 3 The method using Archimedean operator by [32] (P2) 5 4 3 1 6 2 The method using logarithmic operation by [36] (P3) 5 3 2 1 6 4 The method using cosine similarity measures by [37] (P4) 3 2 4 1 5 6 The method using induced generalized aggregation operator by [45] Specifically, the method based on Archimedean operators proposed by Ashraf et al [23] is applied in this numerical example. The result of an alternative ranking is…”
Section: Ranking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations