1999
DOI: 10.1006/aima.1998.1798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical 2-Categories and 4-Manifold Invariants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us briefly explain where they differ. The main motivation for our approach is that we are trying to understand the differential geometry behind the four-dimensional state-sum models defined by the first author of the present paper [22,21]. For the understanding of these state-sums it would be helpful to find a categorical way of perceiving the relation between homotopy theory and differential geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us briefly explain where they differ. The main motivation for our approach is that we are trying to understand the differential geometry behind the four-dimensional state-sum models defined by the first author of the present paper [22,21]. For the understanding of these state-sums it would be helpful to find a categorical way of perceiving the relation between homotopy theory and differential geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For weak versions of 2-groups, see [15]. A general framework for state sum invariants of four-manifolds is provided by Mackaay's construction [34].…”
Section: Technical Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their "n-categories with duals", they generalize the fact that the notion of adjoint functor can be expressed in 2-categorical terms within the 2-category 1CAT . Mackaay describes the application of internal adjoints to 4-manifold invariants in [157]. The notion of adjoint generalizes within an n-category to the notion of dual of any i-morphism for 0 < i < n. At the top level of n-morphisms, the dual operation should either be: ignored; imposed as additional structure; or pushed to ∞ by considering directly the theory of ∞-categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%