2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00454-012-9394-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sphere and Dot Product Representations of Graphs

Abstract: A graph G is a k-sphere graph if there are k-dimensional real vectors v 1 , . . . , v n such that ij ∈ E(G) if and only if the distance between v i and v j is at most 1. A graph G is a k-dot product graph if there are k-dimensional real vectors v 1 , . . . , v n such that ij ∈ E(G) if and only if the dot product of v i and v j is at least 1.By relating these two geometric graph constructions to oriented k-hyperplane arrangements, we prove that the problems of deciding, given a graph G, whether G is a k-sphere … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although for social networks the necessary data to obtain a representation should be readily available, this is not true in general. Given the difficulty in building a representation from the graph (see [21]), such representation-less algorithms could prove useful, and would be interesting from a theoretical point of view. We note that our algorithms for Clique on 2-dot product graphs and for Independent Set on d 0 -dot product graphs and on d + -dot product graphs already do not require a representation to be given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although for social networks the necessary data to obtain a representation should be readily available, this is not true in general. Given the difficulty in building a representation from the graph (see [21]), such representation-less algorithms could prove useful, and would be interesting from a theoretical point of view. We note that our algorithms for Clique on 2-dot product graphs and for Independent Set on d 0 -dot product graphs and on d + -dot product graphs already do not require a representation to be given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Kang and Müller [21] showed the problem of deciding whether a graph has dot product dimension d is NP-hard for all fixed d ≥ 2 (membership in NP is still open). They also proved that an exponential number of bits is sufficient and can be necessary to store a d-dot product representation of a dot product graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case M = R m , the problem of describing the set G (1) (R m ) is equivalent to asking which graphs are realizable as R m -geometric graphs in a given dimension m. There is a vast literature about this problem and, commonly, geometric graphs realizable in dimension m are called m-sphere graphs while the minimal dimension m such that a given graph is an m-sphere graph is called its sphericity. In [35] it is proven that every graph has finite sphericity; in [32] the authors prove that the problem of deciding, given a graph , whether is an m-sphere is NP-hard for all m > 1. We can also observe that, for each m > 0, there are graphs that are not m-sphere graphs.…”
Section: Riemannian Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where norm( RCap k ) and norm( ACap k ) are the normalised vector of the capabilities requirements of tasks and capabilities of agents allocated to G k , respectively; and mc r k is the indicator of the r th capability, which describes that to what extant G k misses the r th capability, if mc r k ≤0, mc r k = 0, otherwise, mc r k = mc r k . Finally, the similarity value between the vector of the missed capabilities requirements of tasks allocated to G k and the normalised vector of capabilities of an unallocated agent A u (i.e., norm( Cap u )=(nc 1 u , nc 2 u , ..., nc R u )) can be calculated by the dot product of two vectors [24], which can be described as follows.…”
Section: Agent Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%