2021
DOI: 10.5802/crmeca.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPH numerical computations of wave impact onto a vertical wall with experimental comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from Figure 3, the multiphase results show an underestimation of the water column movement by a factor of 0.7, while the single-phase can match the experiment quite well with a factor of 0.92. This result may happen because the dualSPHysics models the air as weakly compressible, which is inline with Lu et al, 2021. Because of that, the exitance of air suppresses the extent to which the water column can move. This is proven by the fact that singlephase results, which model the air above the water as a void, was able to closely match the experimental results.…”
Section: Current Research Explores the Application Of Lagrangianmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As can be seen from Figure 3, the multiphase results show an underestimation of the water column movement by a factor of 0.7, while the single-phase can match the experiment quite well with a factor of 0.92. This result may happen because the dualSPHysics models the air as weakly compressible, which is inline with Lu et al, 2021. Because of that, the exitance of air suppresses the extent to which the water column can move. This is proven by the fact that singlephase results, which model the air above the water as a void, was able to closely match the experimental results.…”
Section: Current Research Explores the Application Of Lagrangianmentioning
confidence: 82%