2019
DOI: 10.32614/rj-2019-053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

spGARCH: An R-Package for Spatial and Spatiotemporal ARCH and GARCH models

Abstract: In this paper, a general overview on spatial and spatiotemporal ARCH models is provided. In particular, we distinguish between three different spatial ARCH-type models. In addition to the original definition of Otto et al. ( 2016), we introduce an logarithmic spatial ARCH model in this paper. For this new model, maximum-likelihood estimators for the parameters are proposed. In addition, we consider a new complex-valued definition of the spatial ARCH process. Moreover, spatial GARCH models are briefly discussed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for direct generalisation of GARCH or E-GARCH models like in Otto et al (2018); , difficult assumptions for the existence or invertibility of the process are required in the general case. In addition, existing software could directly be used with some adaptations for the spatiotemporal case (see Otto 2019).…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for direct generalisation of GARCH or E-GARCH models like in Otto et al (2018); , difficult assumptions for the existence or invertibility of the process are required in the general case. In addition, existing software could directly be used with some adaptations for the spatiotemporal case (see Otto 2019).…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residuals that have a constant variance (homoscedasticity) are one of the fundamental presumptions in estimating the regression coefficients with OLS so that the estimation results have a low standard error [4]. Unfortunately, this criterion is often not met, especially when examining cross-sectional data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%