2021
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations: A Comparison of Modified and Supplemented Spetzler-Martin Grading Systems

Abstract: BACKGROUND The modified Spetzler-Martin (SM) grading system proposes that grade III arteriovenous malformation (AVM) subtypes are associated with variable microsurgical risks, with small AVMs (III−) having lower risk and medium/eloquent AVMs (III+) having higher risk. Adding patient age and AVM bleeding status and compactness to the SM grade produces a score – the supplemented SM (Supp-SM) grade – to more accurately assess preoperative risk. O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 Importantly, the AVM-5 is not intended to supplant these existing scores for AVM classification but rather serves as an additional, complementary clinical tool for risk stratification from the alternative perspective of comorbidity burden. While the primary endpoint used to validate the Lawton-Young grade and AVICH was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and followup, [34][35][36][37]42 our AVM-5 score was correlated to several additional outcomes at the inpatient level, including medical complications, LOS, and costs. Each of the AVM-5's variables, excluding hydrocephalus, also has the advantage of being a binary variable easily obtained from chart review and physical examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 Importantly, the AVM-5 is not intended to supplant these existing scores for AVM classification but rather serves as an additional, complementary clinical tool for risk stratification from the alternative perspective of comorbidity burden. While the primary endpoint used to validate the Lawton-Young grade and AVICH was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and followup, [34][35][36][37]42 our AVM-5 score was correlated to several additional outcomes at the inpatient level, including medical complications, LOS, and costs. Each of the AVM-5's variables, excluding hydrocephalus, also has the advantage of being a binary variable easily obtained from chart review and physical examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifications have been proposed to estimate risks and benefits. [1,2,4,[8][9][10][11] The most used classification is the Spetzler-Martin classification, which allows the assessment of surgical risk using as criteria the size, location, and presence or absence of deep drainage of the lesion, according to the following punctuation: [1,2,4,[8][9][10][11] • Size: While the classifications above aim to estimate the surgical risk, the Pollock-Flickinger score estimates the likelihood of complete AVM occlusion without neurologic deficit after radiosurgery and is calculated according to the formula: 0.1 x volume in mL + 0.02 x age in years added by 0.5 if the AVM is located in the thalamus, basal ganglia, or brainstem. [1,2]…”
Section: Complementary Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%

Therapeutic Options for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

Kovacsik C. Balzano,
Venske Boteon,
Vilatoro Jodar
et al. 2024
Preprint
“…They suggest that even in lower grade AVMs, adjunctive embolization should be considered to achieve less intraoperative blood loss 33. Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade III AVMs make up a broader group with four subtypes—S1E1V1, S2E0V1, S2E1V0, and S3E0V0—and multiple attempts have been made to delineate the risk of this grade in a nuanced way 34 35. While there is no clear evidence that the risk of hemorrhage meaningfully differs for grade III AVMs from the approximate 2.2% per year baseline natural history risk of rupture for brain AVMs in general,36 the surgical risk increases with the grade.…”
Section: Microsurgerymentioning
confidence: 99%