2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spermatophore implantation in Rossia moelleri Steenstrup, 1856 (Sepiolidae; Cephalopoda)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
1
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
41
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The spermatophoric reaction is a phenomenon driven by the contraction of the spermatophore elastic tunics and by the hydrostatic pressure caused by the uptake of water through osmotic processes (Drew 1919;Austin et al 1964;Mann 1984). In decapod cephalopod species in general, this reaction is known to be fast (Drew 1919;Austin et al 1964;Mann 1984;Takahama et al 1991;Hoving et al 2009), which is confirmed in the Carol bobtail squid (30-90 s) from our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The spermatophoric reaction is a phenomenon driven by the contraction of the spermatophore elastic tunics and by the hydrostatic pressure caused by the uptake of water through osmotic processes (Drew 1919;Austin et al 1964;Mann 1984). In decapod cephalopod species in general, this reaction is known to be fast (Drew 1919;Austin et al 1964;Mann 1984;Takahama et al 1991;Hoving et al 2009), which is confirmed in the Carol bobtail squid (30-90 s) from our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…At present, there is no evidence that N. caroli transfer inverting spermatophores by the hectocotyli; however, this has been observed, recently, in Sepietta oweniana (Cuccu et al 2010). The fact that no spermatangia and only inverted spermatophores were obtained in this study by submerging the spermatophores in seawater may indicate that organic fluids or tissue contact is needed to complete the process; according to Hoving et al (2009); sufficiently long and proper contact with the female tissue seems an important factor to ensure implantation. Implanting spermatangia in the female body is known to be an efficient way to allow sperm storage, due to the lack of a functional bursa copulatrix or seminal receptacle (Nesis 1995).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different numbers of spermatangia can be observed in subfamily Rossinae species, such as Rossia molleri 6-21 (Hoving et al, 2009);Semirossia.patagonica 2-19 (Önsoy et al, 2008); Neorossia caroli 1-30 (Salman, 2011), which do not contain bursa copulatrix. .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%