2016
DOI: 10.1002/ar.23505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spermatogonia, Germline Cells, and Testicular Organization in the Characiform Prochilodus lineatus Studied Using Histological, Stereological, and Morphometric Approaches

Abstract: Prochilodus lineatus is an important representative of the order Characiformes and a species that offers great advantages to fish farming. Therefore, detailed knowledge of its reproductive biology can be applied to various fields of production and biotechnology. In this study, we have identified testicular germ cells during spermatogenesis and have evaluated the volumetric proportion of the testes occupied by structures of the tubular and intertubular compartments. In addition, the individual volume of type A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For several decades, knowledge of the testicular structure and spermatogenesis of fish has been important to understand the reproductive biology of the species and the mechanisms involved in the maturation of sperm[ 1 3 ]. More recently, these data have established different reproductive strategies, evolutionary adaptations to aquatic environments[ 4 7 ] and a broad understanding of phylogenetic and systematic relationships [ 8 , 9 ]. However, there are few studies that address the morphological differences between species of the same family [ 9 11 ], or between subfamilies [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several decades, knowledge of the testicular structure and spermatogenesis of fish has been important to understand the reproductive biology of the species and the mechanisms involved in the maturation of sperm[ 1 3 ]. More recently, these data have established different reproductive strategies, evolutionary adaptations to aquatic environments[ 4 7 ] and a broad understanding of phylogenetic and systematic relationships [ 8 , 9 ]. However, there are few studies that address the morphological differences between species of the same family [ 9 11 ], or between subfamilies [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%