2014
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.1040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm variation within a single ejaculate affects offspring development in Atlantic salmon

Abstract: It is generally believed that variation in sperm phenotype within a single ejaculate has no consequences for offspring performance, because sperm phenotypes are thought not to reflect sperm genotypes. We show that variation in individual sperm function within an ejaculate affects the performance of the resulting offspring in the Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. We experimentally manipulated the time between sperm activation and fertilization in order to select for sperm cohorts differing in longevity within single… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(49 reference statements)
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1; see SI Materials and Methods for details), but this difference in fertilization success is unlikely to cause the fitness differences observed between the two treatments for two reasons. First, decreasing fertilization success and resulting potential selection among eggs for sperm did not have any fitness effects on offspring in a similar setup (14). Second, in our outcrosses between experimental fish and wild-type fish, the fertilization success was about 4% higher in the LAT treatment than in the SAT treatment in males (Fig.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S1; see SI Materials and Methods for details), but this difference in fertilization success is unlikely to cause the fitness differences observed between the two treatments for two reasons. First, decreasing fertilization success and resulting potential selection among eggs for sperm did not have any fitness effects on offspring in a similar setup (14). Second, in our outcrosses between experimental fish and wild-type fish, the fertilization success was about 4% higher in the LAT treatment than in the SAT treatment in males (Fig.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 83%
“…In fact, two recent studies suggested a possible link between sperm phenotype and offspring phenotype: In a broadcast spawning ascidian, Styela plicata, longer-lived sperm sired offspring with higher early-life survival (13), and in the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, sperm with intermediate longevity sired faster-hatching offspring (14). However, no published study to date has separated sperm aging from the underlying genetic or epigenetic variation among sib sperm or has provided insights into the long-term fitness effects of variation in sperm phenotypes within a single ejaculate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animals, evidence is accumulating of selection based on the haploid genotype of sperm at a number of loci [sperm adhesion molecule Spam1 (44); segregation distortion responder Rsp (45); the t-locus responder Tcr (46); and likely Catsper1, a voltage-gated calcium channel located in the plasma membrane of the sperm tail (47)]. In addition, preliminary evidence in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) suggests that variation in sperm phenotype at the intraejaculate level impacts performance in the resulting offspring (48). The efficacy of transcript sharing across the syncytium during postmeiotic sperm maturation has been measured only in a few species, and the extent of haploid expression among sperm deserves further empirical work in a broader array of species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar study in the Atlantic salmon Salmo salar showed effects of sperm longevity on time until hatching (Immler et al. ). More recently, a study in the zebrafish Danio rerio provided strong evidence for the impact of selection at the haploid sperm level on offspring survival and reproductive success and linked sperm phenotype to sperm genotype (Alavioon et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%