1980
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0600213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm populations in the female genital tract of the rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings again are inconsistent with the conclusion (Cohen & McNaughton, 1974;Cohen & Tyler, 1980) that spermatozoa transported naturally represent an elite population. In both these studies, the competence of naturally transported spermatozoa was compared to that of washed ejaculated spermatozoa following their mixed insemination directly into the uterine horns of a second doe.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…These findings again are inconsistent with the conclusion (Cohen & McNaughton, 1974;Cohen & Tyler, 1980) that spermatozoa transported naturally represent an elite population. In both these studies, the competence of naturally transported spermatozoa was compared to that of washed ejaculated spermatozoa following their mixed insemination directly into the uterine horns of a second doe.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Similarly, Cohen & Tyler (1980) found that the first few spermatozoa to pass through the rabbit cervix were uncoatable by IgG and were also very fertile when transferred to the uteri of recipient does. It is therefore possible that the cervix normally only permits a few spermatozoa to reach the site of fertilization, perhaps discriminating on IgG binding affinity (Cohen & Werrett, 1975; but see Taylor, 1982 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is also evidence that sperm-induced leucocytosis occurs in the human cervix (I. Pandya, unpublished observations). Tyler (1977b) and Cohen & Tyler (1980) Parker, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) The fertilizing potential of spermatozoa recovered from the oviduct (as expressed by the number of spermatozoa that should be supplied for fertilizing an egg, or by the time required for penetration of eggs in vitro) is much higher than that of ejaculated spermatozoa or spermatozoa recovered from the uterus [20][21][22]. 3) In mammals, a considerable fraction of the spermatozoa ejaculated into the female reproductive tract is retained with reduced motility in storage sites; when ovulation occurs, some of them resume high motility and travel the distance between the storage and the fertilization sites within minutes [23][24][25][26] (see [5] for review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%