2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1989.tb02425.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm Motile Efficiency (SME) of Fresh Spermatozoa in a Hypotonic Medium Correlates with their Cryosurvival in Fertile Men and Infertility Patients (Predicting Test)/Die Spermien-Motilitätseffizienz (SME) von Spermien in einem hypotonen Medium korreliert

Abstract: Ein signifikanter Unterschied war sowohl hinsichtlich der SME nach Verdiinnung des Frischspermas mit 140 mOsm Losung als auch nach Kryokonservierung zwischen der fertilen Kontrollgruppe und der Gruppe der infertilen Patienten nachweisbar (Mann-Whitney-U-test). Die beiden Gruppen unterschieden sich in der Diskriminanzanalyse mit hochstem Signifikanzniveau in der SME unmittelbar nach Zugabe der hypoosmolaren Losung.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S perm cryopreservation has been an important tool in assisted reproductive technology (ART). There have been many comprehensive reports on the cryopreservation of sperm in fertile and infertile men (Glander et al, 1989;Mossad et al, 1994;Tomlinson and Barratt, 1999). Furthermore, cryosurvival of washed and unwashed human sperm in normal and subnormal semen samples in the liquid phase of liquid nitrogen has also been reported (Keel and Webster, 1989;Hammadeh et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S perm cryopreservation has been an important tool in assisted reproductive technology (ART). There have been many comprehensive reports on the cryopreservation of sperm in fertile and infertile men (Glander et al, 1989;Mossad et al, 1994;Tomlinson and Barratt, 1999). Furthermore, cryosurvival of washed and unwashed human sperm in normal and subnormal semen samples in the liquid phase of liquid nitrogen has also been reported (Keel and Webster, 1989;Hammadeh et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%