1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57981-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm morphology and in vitro fertilization outcome: a direct comparison of World Health Organization and strict criteria methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, sperm morphology is much emphasized recently and is proven to be one of the important predictors in determining the fertilizing capacity of sperm both in vivo and in vitro conditions [23][24][25]. Several clinical studies have demonstrated a clear association between sperm head morphology and improvement in IVF success rate [4,26,27]. However, other works showed lack of correlation between these parameters [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of these, sperm morphology is much emphasized recently and is proven to be one of the important predictors in determining the fertilizing capacity of sperm both in vivo and in vitro conditions [23][24][25]. Several clinical studies have demonstrated a clear association between sperm head morphology and improvement in IVF success rate [4,26,27]. However, other works showed lack of correlation between these parameters [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is primarily evaluated by routine semen analysis which assesses the sperm count, motility and morphological classification [1]. Various morphological abnormalities of sperm head and morphometric parameters are often associated with infertility and to a large extent influence the fertilization cates and pregnancy outcome [2][3][4]. Traditionally, these parameters were routinely evaluated by light microscopy, but the drawbacks of this methodology such as subjectivity and high interobserver variability makes interpretation unreliable [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such illusions are a reality and can influence our views also on micrographs. Figure 3 contains the morphological data taken from Appendix Table 1.2 in the 5th WHO manual [6], data from my own laboratory as they were in the early 1980s, and information from Morgentaler et al [16]. The shaded areas represent the 95% CI when calculated according to Altman et al [14] and under the assumption that all assessments are fully dichotomised.…”
Section: Morphology Of Spermatozoamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lines referring to Morgentaler et al [16] are constructed from data in their publication and refer to the assessment according to 'strict criteria' or 'traditional morphology' (WHO 1987), respectively. The conclusion drawn by Morgentaler et al [16] was that 'comparison of traditional morphology and strict criteria with regard to in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome favored traditional morphology in several areas.…”
Section: Morphology Of Spermatozoamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation