2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm DNA fragmentation in boars is delayed or abolished by using sperm extenders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no significant differences in chromatin integrity among the samples in the first and second period in our studies. Similar findings were reported previously in boar semen by Perez-Llano et al (2006) [18], who found that sperm extenders may delay or partially prevent sperm DNA fragmentation. However, in our study, higher denaturation of DNA chromatin was observed in the third period in TG and CL samples compared with the TG+A TG and CL+A CL samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There were no significant differences in chromatin integrity among the samples in the first and second period in our studies. Similar findings were reported previously in boar semen by Perez-Llano et al (2006) [18], who found that sperm extenders may delay or partially prevent sperm DNA fragmentation. However, in our study, higher denaturation of DNA chromatin was observed in the third period in TG and CL samples compared with the TG+A TG and CL+A CL samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Results were analyzed using least square means (LSMs). Period 1 included days 1-8; period 2 included days 9-14; and period 3 included days [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Different superscript letters (a-c) indicate differences (P<0.05) among the extenders.…”
Section: Motilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some researchers have positively correlated the integrity of sperm chromatin with other qualitative semen variables such as motility and morphology (Foxcroft et al 2008). Others, such as Perez-Llano et al (2006) found that DNA fragmentation is negatively correlated with the evaluation of classic sperm variables. However, both studies agree that it is affected by semen handling and is associated with fertility and embryo development efficiency.…”
Section: P-valuementioning
confidence: 99%