2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm DNA fragmentation in a random sample of the Spanish boar livestock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, in other mammals, correlation was found in fertile but not subfertile stallions using a TUNEL assay for DNA damage determination, although in this case magnitude was not high (17). When sperm morphology is considered, a negative correlation is usually reported (18,19). The correlation most frequently reported for DNA fragmentation is a high negative relationship with sperm motility, either total or progressive.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Conversely, in other mammals, correlation was found in fertile but not subfertile stallions using a TUNEL assay for DNA damage determination, although in this case magnitude was not high (17). When sperm morphology is considered, a negative correlation is usually reported (18,19). The correlation most frequently reported for DNA fragmentation is a high negative relationship with sperm motility, either total or progressive.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this sense Parrilla et al (2012) showed that ejaculate spermatozoa from individual boars can respond in a boar-dependent manner to different semen-processing techniques. It could be then hypothesized that different qualitative characteristics, such as DNA fragmentation index (Lopez-Fernandez et al 2008) of sperm samples, could be compromising the TX pre-treatment reproducibility within different boar samples and could be the basis of the different fertilization rates obtained from different males, since DNA fragmentation in boar sperm has been correlated with poor fertility outcomes (Boe-Hansen et al 2008;Didion et al 2009). Moreover, in further experiments it could be interesting to study the effect of the TX treatment in later embryo development stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence as well as the incidence of abnormal chromatin structure in spermatozoa from human and domestic animal species varies greatly. In the present and in other studies (López-Fernández et al 2008), the incidence of chromatin instability in boar sperm has been found to be generally low and has not shown a constant correlation with any one sperm defect except for attached cytoplasmic droplets. A correlation between the susceptibility of DNA to denaturation and sperm cytoplasmic droplets was also observed in human (Fischer et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…(Khalil et al 2006). Whereas cytoplasmic droplets present a quite common sperm abnormality in boar ejaculates, the incidence of chromatin instability seems to be relatively low in commercial boar semen (López-Fernández et al 2008). However, it has been suggested that even low numbers of sperm (5-10%) with clearly disturbed chromatin structure may imply the presence of undiagnosed chromatin disturbances in a larger population of sperm (Evenson et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%