2009
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm competitiveness in frogs: slow and steady wins the race

Abstract: When sperm compete to fertilize available ova, selection is expected to favour ejaculate traits that contribute to a male's fertilization success. While there is much evidence to show that selection favours increased numbers of sperm, only a handful of empirical studies have examined how variation in sperm form and function contributes to competitive fertilization success. Here, we examine selection acting on sperm form and function in the externally fertilizing myobatrachid frog, Crinia georgiana. Using in vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(83 reference statements)
3
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall positive relationship between relative sperm number and fertilization success in the present study is also in agreement with empirical evidence from other external fertilizers experiencing sperm competition (Dziminski et al, 2009;Ottesen et al, 2009). It also corresponds with results showing an interspecific relationship between the intensity of sperm competition and sperm production in external fertilizers (Byrne et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall positive relationship between relative sperm number and fertilization success in the present study is also in agreement with empirical evidence from other external fertilizers experiencing sperm competition (Dziminski et al, 2009;Ottesen et al, 2009). It also corresponds with results showing an interspecific relationship between the intensity of sperm competition and sperm production in external fertilizers (Byrne et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Studies on the importance of sperm velocity have been conducted in several species (Gage et al, 2004;Casselman et al, 2006;Rudolfsen et al, 2008;Evans et al, 2013) producing equivocal results. For example, in the myobatrachid frog (Crinia georgiana) the fertilization success of the focal male increases as his relative sperm swimming speed decreases (Dziminski et al, 2009), while for the walleye sperm velocity is positively related to fertilization success (Casselman et al, 2006). Yet, in sperm competition it intuitively seems best not just to ejaculate many sperm cells close to and in synchrony with the spawning female, but also to maximize sperm velocity and the number of motile sperm cells-at least for a "Darwinian demon" (Law, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperm velocity has been found to be a critical determinant of fertilization success in diverse taxa, with faster sperm having an advantage in some taxa (e.g., refs. 60 and 61) and slower sperm having an advantage in others (44,62). In D. melanogaster, slower sperm have been shown to be superior in displacing and resisting displacement by faster sperm, with sperm velocity significantly influenced by male genotype (44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CASA system was set to detect a cell size of 5–25 pixels, a minimum cell detection contrast of 20 and a static cell intensity of 80. The VAP cut‐off was 5 μ m s −1 because myobatrachid frog sperm are known to swim very slowly (Dziminski et al ., ). Immotile spermatozoa (0 μ m s −1 ) did not contribute to the measurement of average sperm velocity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%