1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002650050501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
198
3
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
14
198
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Møller (1987) showed that female extrapair copulation decreased with increasing male mate guarding, which can be regarded as female preference for males who have high fertilization ability. Likewise, males that prevent other males from settling nearby suffer less paternity loss (e.g., Møller and Ninni 1998;Hasegawa et al 2010b; but see Saino et al 1999) and thus this might also be female preference for indirect parental care (Table 1).…”
Section: Resources Defended or Provided By Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Møller (1987) showed that female extrapair copulation decreased with increasing male mate guarding, which can be regarded as female preference for males who have high fertilization ability. Likewise, males that prevent other males from settling nearby suffer less paternity loss (e.g., Møller and Ninni 1998;Hasegawa et al 2010b; but see Saino et al 1999) and thus this might also be female preference for indirect parental care (Table 1).…”
Section: Resources Defended or Provided By Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females would rather obtain indirect benefits (i.e., genes for attractiveness and viability) by preferring well-ornamented males (Møller 1994a; also see Møller and Jennions 2001 for unpublished data on song in relation to direct benefits). Still, even in this model species of female mate choice, direct evidence of female mate choice is scarce (but see Møller 1988 for female extra-pair copulation behavior), and most of them rely on indirect evidence such as mating pattern or extra-pair paternity, both of which can be affected by male-male contests, male strategy, or ecological factors such as inter-nest distance, which cannot easily be teased apart by experimental manipulation (e.g., Hasegawa et al 2010b;Lifjeld et al 2011;reviewed in Westneat and Stewart 2003;also see Møller 1991b;Møller and Ninni 1998;Saino et al 1999 for relationship between inter-nest distance and extrapair copulation or paternity). Thus, these observations and even experiments should be interpreted carefully, though careful interpretation is required for other works as well (e.g., for those with small sample size; see below).…”
Section: Secondary Sexual Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPP reflects variance in male mating success (Møller & Ninni 1998), and has been shown to affect the strength of sexual selection intraspecifically (Sheldon & Ellegren 1999). Relative testes size and sexual dichromatism are both known to be interspecifically positively correlated with rates of EPP (Møller & Birkhead 1994;Møller & Briskie 1995;Owens & Hartley 1998) as well as with each other (Dunn et al 2001), and are predictors of other sexually selected phenomena, such as sexual size dimorphism and social mating system (Dunn et al 2001;Pitcher et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis is a quantitative approach to summarize a body of research by examining the magnitude and the generality of a predicted pattern, while taking sample sizes into account. It also provides a way to investigate the heterogeneity among studies, and to identify modulatory variables that may account for such heterogeneity (Hedges & Olkin 1985;Rosenthal 1991;Møller & Ninni 1998;Roberts et al 2004). We analysed the existing literature on male androgen patterns in response to sexual and paternal behaviour across all vertebrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%