Sperm Biology 2009
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-372568-4.00009-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm and speciation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
140
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 204 publications
1
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have not performed the critical test of this prediction using Female Fertilization Bias 559 within-species variation in male quality, we have demonstrated precisely this mechanism of sperm choice using an extreme case of differential male quality: species identity. When D. simulans females were inseminated by both a D. simulans and a D. mauritiana male, females significantly switched between using sperm predominantly from the SR when the conspecific male mated first and from the spermathecae when the conspecific male mated second, thus biasing fertilization toward conspecific sperm (i.e., conspecific sperm precedence; Price 1997;Howard et al 2009) irrespective of mating order (Manier et al 2013b). Although this may seem unexpectedly sophisticated, biased use of sperm from different storage sites has also been demonstrated for the giant cuttlefish Sepia apama (Naud et al 2005), and there is evidence that females of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma similarly shift between different storage locations differing in composition of competing sperm dependent on the context of oviposition (Siva-Jothy andHooper 1995, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we have not performed the critical test of this prediction using Female Fertilization Bias 559 within-species variation in male quality, we have demonstrated precisely this mechanism of sperm choice using an extreme case of differential male quality: species identity. When D. simulans females were inseminated by both a D. simulans and a D. mauritiana male, females significantly switched between using sperm predominantly from the SR when the conspecific male mated first and from the spermathecae when the conspecific male mated second, thus biasing fertilization toward conspecific sperm (i.e., conspecific sperm precedence; Price 1997;Howard et al 2009) irrespective of mating order (Manier et al 2013b). Although this may seem unexpectedly sophisticated, biased use of sperm from different storage sites has also been demonstrated for the giant cuttlefish Sepia apama (Naud et al 2005), and there is evidence that females of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma similarly shift between different storage locations differing in composition of competing sperm dependent on the context of oviposition (Siva-Jothy andHooper 1995, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female sperm-storage organs enhance sperm survival and temporally separate insemination from fertilization, expanding the temporal, morphological, and biochemical arenas of postcopulatory sexual selection in general, and are predicted to extend the opportunity for female sperm choice in particular (Birkhead et al 1993;Eberhard 1996;Pitnick et al 2009). Sperm-storage organ morphology can be highly diverse (e.g., birds: Birkhead and Møller 1992; pulmonate snails : Baur 1998;spiders: Uhl 2002;insects: Theodor 1976;Puniamoorthy et al 2010;Higginson et al 2012b), rapidly divergent (e.g., Pitnick et al 1999Pitnick et al , 2003 and have been found to exhibit correlated evolution with sperm morphology in diverse taxa (reviewed by Pitnick et al 2009;Higginson et al 2012b), which in turn may promote reproductive isolation between species (Howard et al 2009;Manier et al 2013a). Relatively little is known, however, about female sperm-storage organ function (Schnakenberg et al 2012), particularly with regard to sperm choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperm is known to evolve very rapidly [9] and divergence in sperm characteristics between the parental species could lead to suboptimal fertilization capacity in hybrids with intermediate sperm traits. The severity of problems affecting hybrid sperm should depend on the degree of divergence rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org Biol Lett 9: 20130169 between the parental species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the sperm of hybrid males may also compete poorly against pure-species sperm, and mechanisms of cryptic female choice may be at play [9]. In addition, hybrid males may produce low quantities of sperm, or the sperm may swim poorly or fail to fuse with eggs because of incompatibilities between reproductive proteins [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C are fertilized by conspecific sperm at much higher rates (Geyer and Palumbi, 2005). Such conspecific sperm precedence ( Figure 1) is a common feature of internally fertilizing insects and mammals (Howard, 1999;Howard et al, 2008), but has rarely been tested for explicitly among broadcast spawners.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%