2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm and embryo analysis of similar t(7;10) translocations transmitted in two families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the primary incidence of chromosome malsegregation can be assessed. Some previous studies, investigating embryos produced by carriers of chromosome rearrangements undergoing PGD, have produced data supporting the existence of an ICE [8], [12]. However, once again there is controversy with other research suggesting that an ICE is either entirely absent or negligible in these patients [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, the primary incidence of chromosome malsegregation can be assessed. Some previous studies, investigating embryos produced by carriers of chromosome rearrangements undergoing PGD, have produced data supporting the existence of an ICE [8], [12]. However, once again there is controversy with other research suggesting that an ICE is either entirely absent or negligible in these patients [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The incidence of chromosomally imbalance or aneuploid gametes may even vary between individual translocation carriers, even if where the same chromosomes are involved in the translocation (Vozdova et al, 2008). For carriers of balanced chromosomal translocations, in vitro fertilization accompanied by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) increases the chance of their fathering a healthy child (Vozdova et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data show divergent results regarding the occurrence and distribution of ICE among carriers. Whereas some authors have observed a significant increase of numerical abnormalities for many of the chromosomes analyzed [Rousseaux et al 1995a;Rousseaux et al 1995b;Van Hummelen et al 1997;Blanco et al 1998;Mercier et al 1998;Blanco et al 2000;Amiel et al 2001;Morel et al 2001;Oliver-Bonet et al 2001;Baccetti et al 2002;Oliver-Bonet et al 2002;Anton et al 2004a;Anton et al 2004b Machev et al 2005;Anton et al 2006;Chen et al 2007;Wiland et al 2007;Anton et al 2008;Vozdova et al 2008;Juchniuk de Vozzi et al 2009;Anton et al 2010;Pellestor et al 2011;Vozdova et al 2011b], others have not [Martini et al 1998;Cifuentes et al 1999;Honda et al 1999;Estop et al 2000;Rives et al 2003;Mikhaail-Philips et al 2004;Oliver-Bonet et al 2004;Mikhaail-Philips et al 2005;Hatakeyama et al 2006;Kekesi et al 2007;Vialard et al 2007].…”
Section: Interchromosomal Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%