2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2022.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spent fuel characterization analysis using various nuclear data libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the fission products contribute to the decay heat power mainly in the short storage period (<50 years). As highlighted in [4], the accuracy of the results obtained from analytical and numerical calculations depends on the degree of the accuracy of available data and on the use of appropriate cross-section libraries [5][6][7]. At present, most of the calculations of spent fuel characteristics after in-service operation are performed by means of validated numerical codes such as ORIGEN (Oak Ridge Isotope Generation, developed at ORNL, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) or KORIGEN (FZK, Hannover, Germany).…”
Section: Storage Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed that the fission products contribute to the decay heat power mainly in the short storage period (<50 years). As highlighted in [4], the accuracy of the results obtained from analytical and numerical calculations depends on the degree of the accuracy of available data and on the use of appropriate cross-section libraries [5][6][7]. At present, most of the calculations of spent fuel characteristics after in-service operation are performed by means of validated numerical codes such as ORIGEN (Oak Ridge Isotope Generation, developed at ORNL, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) or KORIGEN (FZK, Hannover, Germany).…”
Section: Storage Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, most of the calculations of spent fuel characteristics after in-service operation are performed by means of validated numerical codes such as ORIGEN (Oak Ridge Isotope Generation, developed at ORNL, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) or KORIGEN (FZK, Hannover, Germany). However, the behaviour out-ofreactor, at interim storage or final disposal, requires a detailed isotopic characterisation and radioactivity evaluation [6][7][8].…”
Section: Storage Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-17 PIE samples were used to calculate nuclide compositions, uncertainties, and biases, for 4 ARIANE samples (GU1, GU3, BM1, BM3), 8 ENRESA samples (not available in SFCOMPO), the U1 PROTEUS sample (also not available in SFCOMPO), 2 Takahama samples (SF95-4 and SF95-5), and 2 Gundremmingen samples (B23-A1-I2680 and C5-B23-K2680), with the addition of 2 computational cases (S1.PWR and krsko.PWR [14,15]), -271 calorimetric measurements from CLAB (labelled herein as CLAB-2006), GE-Morris, HEDL facilities and the "SKB-Vattenfall" blind test were analyzed for the assembly average decay heat [16][17][18][19], and the decay heat from the 17 (not measured) PIE samples. Detailed studies were independently published for a number of cases, see references [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]50]; summaries are presented in Tables 1 and 2.…”
Section: Studied Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-In references [14,26], the case of a PWR UO 2 assembly is considered, with 4.95% enrichment and a burnup value of 60 MWd/kg. Changes in simulation codes indicate a maximum effect on the assembly decay heat of 4%.…”
Section: Decay Heat Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%