Spenserian Satire

Abstract

This book examines the satirical poetry of Edmund Spenser and argues for his importance as a model and influence for younger poets writing satires in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. The book focuses on reading satirical texts of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries in relation to one another, with specific attention to the role that Edmund Spenser plays in that literary subsystem. The book connects key Spenserian texts in The Shepheardes Calender and the Complaints volume with poems by a range of authors in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, including Joseph Hall, Thomas Nashe, Tailboys Dymoke, Thomas Middleton, and George Wither to advance the thesis that Spenser was seen by his contemporaries as highly relevant to satire in Elizabethan England. For scholars of satire, the book offers a fuller discussion and theorization of the type of satire that Spenser wrote, “indirect satire,” than has been provided elsewhere. A theory of indirect satire benefits not just Spenser studies, but satire studies as well. For scholars of English Renaissance satire in particular, who have tended to focus on the formal verse satires of the 1590s to the exclusion of attention to more indirect forms such as Spenser’s, this book is a corrective, an invitation to recognize the importance of a style of satire that has received little attention.

Weighted gradient inequalities and unique continuation problems

“…In some of early papers on the subject, it is proved that solutions of elliptic systems in the form of (4.1) that vanish of sufficiently high order at the origin are ≡ 0; see [7,15,47] and the references cited in these papers for definitions of elliptic systems. A classical method of proof is to reduce the systems to (quasi-) diagonal form; this approach requires conditions on the regularity and the multiplicity of the eigenvalues of the system that are often difficult to check; see [9,24,29,56]. The strong continuation properties of systems of complex analytic vector fields in the form of Lu = 0 defined on a real-analytic manifold is proved in [1].…”