2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11150-010-9112-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spending time together: the impact of children on couples’ leisure synchronization

Abstract: The presence of children may oblige parents to desynchronize their schedules in order both to minimize childcare expenses and to become more efficient in their domestic tasks. This disconnection between the father's and the mother's schedules may be undesired as such, and may represent an additional component in the overall cost of children as traditionally considered. This article analyzes the impact of children on their parents' schedules, using the French time use survey data (INSEE 1998(INSEE -1999. The c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both husbands’ and wives’ employment—especially long work hours—are negatively associated with marital interaction (e.g., Amato et al, 2007; Booth, Johnson, White, & Edwards, 1984; Roeters & Treas, 2011; White, 1983; but see Roeters & Treas, 2011). From the time use literature we know that individuals in dual-earner couples spend less time with their spouse than individuals in single-earner couples (Kingston & Nock, 1987; Presser, 2000; Voorpostel et al, 2009) as do individuals in couples in which one member works on the interview (i.e., diary) day (Barnet-Verzat et al, 2010; Dew, 2009; Glorieux, Minnen, & van Tienoven, 2011; Polivka, 2008; Wight et al, 2008) and in couples with large differences in paid work hours (Mansour & McKinnish, 2014). For example, Kingston and Nock (1987) drew on a small sample of couples from 1981 and showed that dual-earner couples spend 30 minutes less in total spousal time than single-earner couples.…”
Section: Work Parenting and Couples’ Shared Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both husbands’ and wives’ employment—especially long work hours—are negatively associated with marital interaction (e.g., Amato et al, 2007; Booth, Johnson, White, & Edwards, 1984; Roeters & Treas, 2011; White, 1983; but see Roeters & Treas, 2011). From the time use literature we know that individuals in dual-earner couples spend less time with their spouse than individuals in single-earner couples (Kingston & Nock, 1987; Presser, 2000; Voorpostel et al, 2009) as do individuals in couples in which one member works on the interview (i.e., diary) day (Barnet-Verzat et al, 2010; Dew, 2009; Glorieux, Minnen, & van Tienoven, 2011; Polivka, 2008; Wight et al, 2008) and in couples with large differences in paid work hours (Mansour & McKinnish, 2014). For example, Kingston and Nock (1987) drew on a small sample of couples from 1981 and showed that dual-earner couples spend 30 minutes less in total spousal time than single-earner couples.…”
Section: Work Parenting and Couples’ Shared Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that time diary data are a better mechanism for capturing information on time spent with a spouse (Hamermesh, 2002, 2005), yet only a limited body of research has used this type of data to examine marital interaction. Previous research on couples’ shared time using time diary data has investigated leisure activities (Barnet-Verzat, Pailhé, & Solaz, 2010; Voorpostel, van der Lippe, & Gershuny, 2009), time spent alone with a spouse in any kind of activity (Dew, 2009), and total shared time as well as shared time in different types of activities (Kingston & Nock, 1987; Mansour & McKinnish, 2014). On the basis of our review of the literature, only two studies—Wight et al (2008) and Bianchi et al (2006)—have investigated both total time spent with a spouse and time alone with a spouse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data we use do not allow us to check this explanation, as individuals and not couples are interviewed, except in France. But Daniel S. Hamermesh (2002), using British data, andChristine Barnet-Verzat, Ariane Pailhé, andAnne Solaz (2010) using French data, found that the leisure time spent Note: ***, **, and * indicate statistical significance at the 1, 5, and 10 percent levels, respectively.…”
Section: Time Spent On Leisure Over the Life Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-use use diaries essentially have so far, for the most part, provided information about what individuals are doing (activities) and only subsequently with whom (Barnet-Verzat, Pailhé, & Solaz, 2011;Cardoso, Fontainha, & Monfardini, 2010;Folbre et al, 2005). The with whom information has been slightly more often used to study time with children (Wight, Raley, & Bianchi, 2008).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%