The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.17507/tpls.0812.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spelling Scoring Metrics in Malay Language: An Investigation among Young Spellers

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship among three spelling scoring metrics, namely, words spelled correctly (WSC), correct letter sequences (CLS), and phonological coding (PC) in Malay language. The relationship between spelling measure and word reading measure was studied. There were 866 Primary 1 (Grade 1 equivalent) students from 11 randomly selected public primary schools in Kuching, Sarawak Malaysia who participated in this study. The study showed that the scores from each scoring metr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding has been demonstrated elsewhere that spelling in Malay is more complex than reading (J. A. C. Lee et al, 2020;Tang et al, 2018). Therefore, general and special education teachers may use the percentile norms to identify students who encounter difficulties in reading and students who can read reasonably well but struggle in spelling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding has been demonstrated elsewhere that spelling in Malay is more complex than reading (J. A. C. Lee et al, 2020;Tang et al, 2018). Therefore, general and special education teachers may use the percentile norms to identify students who encounter difficulties in reading and students who can read reasonably well but struggle in spelling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The following measures were included in the reading assessment battery: letter name knowledge, letter name fluency, rapid automatised naming, phonological awareness, phonological memory, spelling, word reading accuracy, word reading efficiency, oral reading fluency, expressive vocabulary, receptive vocabulary, reading comprehension, and listening comprehension tests (J. A. C. Lee et al, 2020;Tang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. C. Lee and Al Otaiba (2017) and Tang et al (2018). The PC system was used in the spelling error coding procedure due to its high correlation with phonological awareness abilities and high sensitivity toward learners' spelling development over time (Ritchey et al, 2010;Tang et al, 2018).…”
Section: (A) Spellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score for each word ranges between 0 and 6. Table 1 shows the description of PC rubrics, with an example each for Malay and English words (see also Tang et al, 2018).…”
Section: (A) Spellingmentioning
confidence: 99%