2008
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speeding up the Evaluation of New Agents in Cancer

Abstract: Despite both the increase in basic biologic knowledge and the fact that many new agents have reached various stages of development during the last 10 years, the number of new treatments that have been approved for patients has not increased as expected. We propose the multi-arm, multi-stage trial design as a way to evaluate treatments faster and more efficiently than current standard trial designs. By using intermediate outcomes and testing a number of new agents (and combinations) simultaneously, the new desi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
101
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14]22 Full details are provided in the protocol. In summary, eligible patients had prostate cancer that was newly diagnosed and metastatic, node-positive, or high-risk locally advanced (with at least two of following: a tumor stage of T3 or T4, a Gleason score of 8 to 10, and a PSA level ≥40 ng per milliliter) or disease that was previously treated with radical surgery or radiotherapy and was now relapsing with high-risk features (in men no longer receiving therapy, a PSA level >4 ng per milliliter with a doubling time of <6 months, a PSA level >20 ng per milliliter, nodal or metastatic relapse, or <12 months of total ADT with an interval of >12 months without treatment).…”
Section: Trial Design and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[12][13][14]22 Full details are provided in the protocol. In summary, eligible patients had prostate cancer that was newly diagnosed and metastatic, node-positive, or high-risk locally advanced (with at least two of following: a tumor stage of T3 or T4, a Gleason score of 8 to 10, and a PSA level ≥40 ng per milliliter) or disease that was previously treated with radical surgery or radiotherapy and was now relapsing with high-risk features (in men no longer receiving therapy, a PSA level >4 ng per milliliter with a doubling time of <6 months, a PSA level >20 ng per milliliter, nodal or metastatic relapse, or <12 months of total ADT with an interval of >12 months without treatment).…”
Section: Trial Design and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses intermediate activity analyses, based on failure-free survival, to cease randomization to research groups that are insufficiently active. [12][13][14] We have previously reported that treatment with docetaxel at the inception of ADT increased median survival from 71 months to 81 months as well as overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.76). 15,16 These results, along with those of a systematic review that included other trials [17][18][19] and of a meta-analysis, 16 led to docetaxel becoming a part of the standard of care for suitable patients with prostate cancer who had not received previous hormone therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last decade, significant advances in cancer research have been made based on sequencing of the human genome, identification of driving growth factors and receptors, and signaling pathways [1]. From 2007 to 2010, research innovations led to an estimated 1,884 phase I, 3,436 phase II, and 1,025 phase III oncology clinical trials [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that pharmaceutical companies spend an average of $1.7 billion dollars per drug from development to market approval [7]. Despite these investments, only 40% of drug applications submitted for consideration are approved [1,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%