2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speeding Up Percolator

Abstract: The processing of peptide tandem mass spectrometry data involves matching observed spectra against a sequence database. The ranking and calibration of these peptide-spectrum matches can be improved substantially using a machine learning postprocessor. Here, we describe our efforts to speed up one widely used postprocessor, Percolator. The improved software is dramatically faster than the previous version of Percolator, even when using relatively few processors. We tested the new version of Percolator on a data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) ( 34 ) with a concatenated decoy search against a Felis catus proteome database (Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL) retrieved on August 13, 2021 from http://uniprot.org ( 35 ). The database search results were postprocessed using Percolator (Crux version 4.0) ( 36 ) and peptides identified at 5% false discovery rate (FDR) were accepted for quantification. TMT reporter ion intensities were extracted using an R script ( 37 ) and differential expression analysis performed with the aid of limma v.3.49.0 in R ( 38 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) ( 34 ) with a concatenated decoy search against a Felis catus proteome database (Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL) retrieved on August 13, 2021 from http://uniprot.org ( 35 ). The database search results were postprocessed using Percolator (Crux version 4.0) ( 36 ) and peptides identified at 5% false discovery rate (FDR) were accepted for quantification. TMT reporter ion intensities were extracted using an R script ( 37 ) and differential expression analysis performed with the aid of limma v.3.49.0 in R ( 38 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OpenSWATH [ 27,88] http://www.openswath.org/en/latest/ EncyclopeDIA [67] https://bitbucket.org/searleb/encyclopedia/wiki/Home Scaffold DIA [67] http://www.proteomesoftware.com/products/dia Skyline [55] https://skyline.ms Spector [66] https://github.com/rpeckner-broad/Specter Percolator [89] https://github.com/percolator/percolator/ PyProphet [52] https://github.com/PyProphet/pyprophet/issues SWATHProphet [90] https://sourceforge.net/projects/sashimi/files/SWATHProphet…”
Section: Library-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second group adopts tool-dependent and data-dependent models to overcome the bias of pre-trained models. The tools in this group are gradient boosting-based Scavager [ 6 ], and support vector machine-based Percolator-related tools (Percolator [ 8 ], MS-GF + Percolator [ 12 ], Mascot Percolator [ 17 ], X!Tandem Percolator [ 10 , 11 ], OMSSA Percolator [ 9 ], speed-up version of Percolator [ 18 ]) and Qranker [ 13 ]. Among them, the most widely used tool is Percolator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%