1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61551-2_68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speeding up constraint propagation by redundant modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The columns corresponding to the tuples (1,2,3), (1,2,4), (1,2,5),...,(1,2,k ) were labelled, in that order; clearly, the matrix is then completely specified. We tried labelling sets of non-overlapping columns (as far as possible given the value of k), for instance, those corresponding to the tuples (1,2,3) and (4,5,6) when fk ¼ 6: this was inspired by the labelling of non-overlapping Fsupercell_ variables in [30], which in that case was a successful labelling strategy. In this case, however, it performed very poorly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The columns corresponding to the tuples (1,2,3), (1,2,4), (1,2,5),...,(1,2,k ) were labelled, in that order; clearly, the matrix is then completely specified. We tried labelling sets of non-overlapping columns (as far as possible given the value of k), for instance, those corresponding to the tuples (1,2,3) and (4,5,6) when fk ¼ 6: this was inspired by the labelling of non-overlapping Fsupercell_ variables in [30], which in that case was a successful labelling strategy. In this case, however, it performed very poorly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we can still extract a CSP solution from any SAT solution: by clauses (5) in any SAT solution each combination of symbols occurs in at least one row of A for each combination of t columns; by clauses (6) each such occurrence induces the corresponding entries in M; and by clauses (2) no more than one value is possible in each M position. In fact the omitted clauses (1,3,4) are implied by clauses (2,5,6), and experiments suggest that omitting them makes little difference to the search effort. It reduces the size of the encoding but not its space complexity, which is dominated by the channelling constraints and is Oð k t À Á btg t Þ literals.…”
Section: A Model For Local Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Good modellers know that combining alternative representations in the same model can improve propagation, among other benefits. To maintain the consistency between these simultaneous alternatives we need to add channelling constraints [3] to the model. Section 4 discuses channelling constraints (also called channels) between alternative representations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%