2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2004.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed of sound in liquid tetrachloromethane and benzene at temperatures from 283.15 K to 333.15 K and pressures up to 30 MPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the authenticity of deviations plotted in the Figure, speeds of sound in liquid tetrachloromethane were also measured at (283.15, 298.15, 313.15, and 333.15) K and at pressures up to 30 MPa. 12 Obtained values were compared with data reported by Lainez et al 13 that were measured in the same laboratory as those by Ahn et al 11 The deviations (triangle data points in Figure 3) from our data are negative with a maximum deviation of less than 0.2%. The deviations originate from the difference in the speed of sound for tetrachloromethane used for the determination of the acoustic path L of our instrument (921.11 m‚s -1 ) 7 and the value reported by Lainez et al 13 (920.12 m‚s -1 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To investigate the authenticity of deviations plotted in the Figure, speeds of sound in liquid tetrachloromethane were also measured at (283.15, 298.15, 313.15, and 333.15) K and at pressures up to 30 MPa. 12 Obtained values were compared with data reported by Lainez et al 13 that were measured in the same laboratory as those by Ahn et al 11 The deviations (triangle data points in Figure 3) from our data are negative with a maximum deviation of less than 0.2%. The deviations originate from the difference in the speed of sound for tetrachloromethane used for the determination of the acoustic path L of our instrument (921.11 m‚s -1 ) 7 and the value reported by Lainez et al 13 (920.12 m‚s -1 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This value corresponds to the point of a diamond shape in the deviation plot in Figure , and the deviation is naturally zero. To investigate the authenticity of deviations plotted in the Figure, speeds of sound in liquid tetrachloromethane were also measured at (283.15, 298.15, 313.15, and 333.15) K and at pressures up to 30 MPa that were measured in the same laboratory as those by Ahn et al The deviations (triangle data points in Figure ) from our data are negative with a maximum deviation of less than 0.2%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…They estimated “an uncertainty of 0.05 % based on the standard deviations obtained for the different fluids.” Additionally, Esperança et al also checked their calibration with measurements in acetone. In this work, we decided to examine the internal coherence of speeds of sound in benzene under high-pressure as reported in the literature and measured in this work (Table S1 of the Supporting Information) by adopting two polynomial equations: one proposed by Sun et al (eq ) and the other suggested by Esperança et al (fitting parameters are reported in Tables S2, S3, and S4 of the Supporting Information). To enlarge the probability to find a global minimum of the least-squares fits, repeated calculations with a set of random starting values for the parameters have been performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed values at elevated pressures are consistent with the estimated values; for example, the differences are −0.3 m·s -1 and −1.1 m·s -1 at 10 MPa and 20 MPa, respectively. In our previous work, we checked the performance of our instrument by measuring the speed of sound in liquid tetrachloromethane at temperatures from 283.15 K to 333.15 K and pressures up to 30 MPa and confirmed the uncertainty in the experimental results to within ±0.2% by comparing with the selected reference data. Therefore, we assume that the uncertainty in the present results is within ±0.2%, at least in the high-density region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%