2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed impacts frontal-plane maneuver stability of individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury

Abstract: Background: Following incomplete spinal cord injury, people often move slowly in an effort to maintain stability during walking maneuvers. Here we examine how maneuver speed impacts frontal-plane stability in people with incomplete spinal cord injury. We hypothesized that the challenge to control frontal-plane stability would increase with maneuver speed; specifically, the minimum lateral margin of stability would be smaller and the required coefficient of friction to avoid a slip would be greater during fast … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study of lateral maneuvers in persons with and without iSCI has revealed trade-offs between stability and maneuverability [ 1 , 8 ], and the current study adds to our understanding of people’s preferences and/or abilities. When laterally maneuvering, individuals must weigh minimizing mechanical energy costs, maintaining stability, and producing adequate lateral ground-on-foot force to maneuver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Study of lateral maneuvers in persons with and without iSCI has revealed trade-offs between stability and maneuverability [ 1 , 8 ], and the current study adds to our understanding of people’s preferences and/or abilities. When laterally maneuvering, individuals must weigh minimizing mechanical energy costs, maintaining stability, and producing adequate lateral ground-on-foot force to maneuver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Given the increased challenge of maneuvering compared to straight walking, we expected that participants with iSCI would maintain a larger MOS compared to their peers without iSCI regardless of potential interaction effects with field and step. Additionally, considering findings of maneuvering without force fields [ 1 , 8 ], we expected the following relations between steps regardless of potential interaction effects with group and field: (1) MOS was expected to be smallest on the initiation step (Fig. 1 ) relative the execution and termination steps as participants bias their COM in the maneuver direction in anticipation of the impending movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study of lateral maneuvers in persons with and without iSCI has revealed trade-offs between stability and maneuverability (1,8), and the current study adds to our understanding of people's preferences and/or abilities. When laterally maneuvering, individuals must weigh minimizing mechanical energy costs, maintaining stability, and producing adequate lateral ground-on-foot force to maneuver.…”
Section: Margin Of Stability Between Groupsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Based on previous work on maneuvers without force elds, we expected individuals to have a smaller MOS on the initiation step, which may allow for a faster maneuver but introduces stability vulnerability (4,8). As anticipated, the MOS min on the initiation step was smallest in nearly all conditions (p < 0.05 for all combinations of groups, steps, and elds except for the initiation versus termination comparison in the Damped eld and in the Ampli ed eld within iSCI).…”
Section: Initiation Stepmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation