2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech Rhythms and Multiplexed Oscillatory Sensory Coding in the Human Brain

Abstract: A neuroimaging study reveals how coupled brain oscillations at different frequencies align with quasi-rhythmic features of continuous speech such as prosody, syllables, and phonemes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

81
841
8
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 587 publications
(932 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
81
841
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the performance of the continuous–continuous GCMI estimator (Section 3.1), we consider MEG data collected from a single subject within a continuous design with an auditory speech stimulus [Gross et al, 2013; Park et al, 2015]. For simplicity we focus here on a sensor‐level time‐domain analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the performance of the continuous–continuous GCMI estimator (Section 3.1), we consider MEG data collected from a single subject within a continuous design with an auditory speech stimulus [Gross et al, 2013; Park et al, 2015]. For simplicity we focus here on a sensor‐level time‐domain analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity we focus here on a sensor‐level time‐domain analysis. Since previous work has shown speech entrainment mostly at lower frequencies, we extracted the wideband amplitude envelope of the speech stimulus [Chandrasekaran et al, 2009; Gross et al, 2013] and then low‐pass filtered with a 12 Hz cutoff (third order noncausal Butterworth). The MEG signal was obtained from a 248‐magnetometer whole‐head MEG system (MAGNES 3600 WH, 4D Neuroimaging).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To interpret these responses in relation to empirical results, we assume that outcomes are sampled every 250 ms. Although this is a little fast for overt exploratory movements in a maze, it corresponds to the intervals between saccadic eye movements in visual exploration (Srihasam, Bullock, & Grossberg, 2009) and the rate at which syllables are articulated in normal speech (Gross et al, 2013). Furthermore, it corresponds to the timescale of neuronal dynamics in the hippocampus (e.g., the duty cycle of theta activity).…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%